摘要
非诉行政案件裁执分离模式在学理和实践中遭遇不同境遇,这缘于理论界和实务界对非诉行政执行的认识和定位存在差异。尽管该模式遇到各种新问题,但是从法规范结构比重、司法数据支撑以及法治政策导向来看,还是有必要继续坚守,其理论正当性和法律依据问题,可以从分权制衡、司法适度能动、职能分离等实质法治主义角度得以诠释,人权保障、正当高效、分离协作应作为其运行的基本原则,在案件管辖上仍应坚持普通法院为主,不宜全部划给跨区划法院,案件类型上宜采取全面裁执分离思路,案件执行上应实现执行程序的规范化、责任承担的合理化、府院关系的正常化。
The system of separating judgment from enforcement in non-lawsuit administrative execution encountered different situations in theory and Practice, this is due to the theory and practice have different understanding and positioning of non-lawsuit administrative execution. Although it encountered a variety of new problems, it is still necessary to persist this system according to the structure of law portion, judicial data and the oriented perspective of legal policy. Its theoretical justification and legal basis can be explained by decentralization and balance, moderate judicial activism, separation of functions and other substantive rule of law. Human rights protection, legitimate and efficient, separation and cooperation should be the basic principles of its operation. In terms of case jurisdiction, the common court should have main duty, which should not be totally assigned to cross-zone court. The judgment and enforcement of this kind of administrative cases should be completely separated. What＇s more, the execution of the case should be under standard procedure and fair distribution of legal liability, and should achieve normalization of the relation between government and court.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第3期98-112,共15页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
基金
齐鲁工业大学2016年人文社科校级规划重点项目"裁执分离视阀下非诉行政执行问题研究"(SKXMZ1602)的阶段性成果
关键词
非诉行政执行
裁执分离
实质法治
Non-lawsuit Administrative Execution
Separating Judgment fromEnforcement
Substantial Rule by Law
