期刊文献+

从“精英”到“群英”:一流本科教学的困局与超越--华中科技大学光电信息国家试点学院教学改革的探索与实践 被引量:6

On Cultivating Elite Students:Challenges and Countermeasures of Undergraduate Education in First-class Research-oriented Universities at the Era of Post-Popularization
原文传递
导出
摘要 在高等教育大众化背景下,"985工程"高校试图通过"拔尖人才培养"平衡规模扩张与精英培养的矛盾,但在后大众化阶段,"精英"教学由于受益面过小而受到来自公平与效率的拷问。为突破高校普遍存在的创新人才培养受益面窄、关注"高峰"有余而"高原"不足、学生自主学习能力缺乏等问题,本文案例学院以"群英"培养理念为统合,进行教学改革并取得系列成效。促进全体大学生共同卓越,共享卓越;放眼国际,与高端产业对接培养,不断驱动群英教育的更新升级,是后大众化高等教育时代重点研究型大学工程教育人才培养的应为之策。 In the context of higher education popularization, the balance between student expansion and elite cultivation has become one of the most challenging problems faced by universities sponsored by 985 Project. However, fairness and efficiency of pilot education reform carried out in several first-class universities are criticized due to such problems as relative small scales and lower autonomous learning competence among students. School of Optical and Electronic Information at Huazhong University of Science and Technology is one of the first pilot schools to perform higher education reform at the national level. Results show that cooperating with hi-tech industries provides possible solutions to cultivating elite students and enables them to have an international view at the era of post-popularization of higher education.
出处 《高等工程教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第2期160-165,共6页 Research in Higher Education of Engineering
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献37

  • 1赵中建.全球教育发展的研究热点.北京:教育科学出版社,1999. 被引量:8
  • 2唐纳德·肯尼迪.学术责任[M].北京:新华出版社,2002.24、23. 被引量:119
  • 3HARMAN G. Quality Assurance for Higher Education: Developing and Managing Quality Assurance in Higher Education Systems and Institutions in Asia and the Pacific[M]. Bangkok : UNESCO, 1996 : 6. 被引量:1
  • 4LIM D. Quality Assurance in Higher Education: A Study of Developing Countries[M]. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2001 : 13. 被引量:1
  • 5ELKEN M. QU Trends 1995-2006 Literature overview[M]. Oslo: University of Oslo, 2009 : 44. 被引量:1
  • 6HAMBLIN D. A Model for Managing Data Assurance in Higher Education[J]. Phoenix Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,2012, (8): 421-435. 被引量:1
  • 7EWELL T. Institutional Characteristics and Faculty, Administrator Perceptions of Outcomes: An Exploratory Analysis [J]. Research in Higher Education, 1989, (2) : 13-36. 被引量:1
  • 8WITTEK L. On the Problems of Asking for a Definition of Quality in Education Scandinavian[J]. Journal of Educational Research, 2011, (12) : 671-684. 被引量:1
  • 9HARVEY L, GREEN D. Defining Quality Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education[J]. 1993, (1) :9-34. 被引量:1
  • 10KUH G D. The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual Framework and Overview of Psychometric Properties [ EB/OL]. [ 2014-02-21]. http ://nsse. iub. edu/pdf/conceptual_framework_2003. pdf. 被引量:1

共引文献26

同被引文献40

引证文献6

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部