摘要
目的比较药物治疗与介入治疗对稳定型心绞痛的治疗效果。方法选取2015年1月至2015年11月冠状动脉造影示至少中度缺血的稳定型心绞痛患者98例，分为药物组40例和介入组58例。应用西雅图心绞痛量表（SAQ）评估两组治疗前后患者生活质量及机体功能状态。统计半年内的心血管性死亡、急性心肌梗死的发生率。结果两组治疗前西雅图心绞痛评分比较差异未见统计学意义（P〉0．05）。两组患者治疗后生活质量及机体功能状态改善均优于基线水平，介入组治疗后1、3、6个月心绞痛评分为（69．7±7．8）、（81．0±8．4）、（89．1±6．4）分，均高于药物组（P〈0．05）。结论药物治疗与介入治疗均可以改善患者的生活质量和机体功能状态，但介入组优于药物组。
ObjectiveTo compare the effects of drug therapy and interventional therapy on stable angina pectoris.MethodsFrom January 2015 to November 2015, 98 patients with stable angina pectoris at least moderate ischemia were selected, and were divided into drug group （40 cases） and intervention group （58 cases）. Seattle Angina questionnaire （SAQ） was used to evaluate the quality of life and functional status of two groups of patients before and after treatment. The incidences of cardivascular death, actue myocardial infarction within six months were observed.ResultsThere was no difference in angina score before treatment （P〉0.05）. At 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, the angina score in the intervention group was 69.7±7.8, 81.0±8.4, 89.1±6.4, which were higher than those in drug group（P〈0.05）.ConclusionsDrug treatment and intervention treatment can improve the patient’s quality of life and functional status, but the intervention group is better than that of drug group.
出处
《中国实用医刊》
2017年第6期19-20,共2页
Chinese Journal of Practical Medicine
