摘要
马克思主义阐释学强调民族主体性,同时认为只有以历史主体性话语对文本进行阐释,才能揭示文本的意义。夏志清运用"新批评"与自由主义观念,在其所著《中国现代小说史》中肆意评判身处半殖民地半封建时代的中国作家及其作品,因而使得阐释主体与被阐释的中国文本之间没有形成历史主义主客体关系。特里·伊格尔顿称这种批评为"个体自由主义"的现代复归。马克思主义阐释学主张以历史主义的民族主体性来揭示文本意义,才是真正具有现代价值的阐释方法。
Marxist Hermeneutics emphasizes the subjectivity of national literature. By so do- ing the ＂meaning of text can be revealed＂, according to Hans-Georg Gadamer, in the text interpretation with historical subjectivity discourse. Combining the method of Neo-criticism and liberalism, American scholar Hsia Chih-tsing scrutinized the texts by the Chinese writ- ers of semi-feudal and semi-colonial China in his A History of Chinese Modern Fiction. Hsia, a westernized interpreting subject, did not form a historic subject-object relationship with the interpreted Chinese texts, making his scrutiny a modern return of ＂individual lib- eralism＂ as criticized by Terry Eagleton. Eileen Chang＇s style of ＂individual freedom＂, which was admired by Hsia Chih-tsing, is in nature a western liberalism that ignores the spirit of China＇s anti-aggression and its struggle for national independence. And the ＂obses- sion with China＂ theme, criticized by Tsia in the modern Chinese novels, is just a manifes- tation of Chinese literary subjectivity. Marxist Hermeneutics advocates revealing text mean- ing with the national subjectivity of the historicism, which is an interpretative method of true value in modern times.
出处
《中国社会科学院研究生院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第2期86-92,共7页
Journal of Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
基金
浙江省哲学社会科学规划项目"‘世界文学重构’中的中国话语"(17NDJC303YB)的阶段性成果
中国社会科学院"马克思主义理论骨干人才计划(2015)"项目支持
关键词
马克思主义阐释学
西方主体
非历史化
《中国现代小说史》
詹姆逊
Marxist Hermeneutics
Western subjectivity
non-historicism
A History ofModern Chinese Fiction
Fredric Jameson
