期刊文献+

基于人脸记忆新任务的元认知监测准确性研究 被引量:5

Study on the Accuracy of Metacognitive Monitoring Based On the New Task of Face Recognition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 元认知监测关注个体对自身认知活动的监控,是重要的高级认知过程。学习判断(judgments of learning)是元认知监测的一种重要形式。该研究同时采用人脸-姓氏记忆新任务与经典词对记忆任务,比较学习判断的准确性在两者中的差异。结果发现:人脸-姓氏记忆的学习判断准确性在相对准确性、绝对准确性和总体判断准确性上均显著高于词对记忆。结果表明:当任务本身的社会适应意义更强时,个体对认知水平的监测更加准确,提示元认知监测技能不仅受到个体自身学习和发展的影响,还可能与人类的长期进化过程有关。 As an important advanced cognitive process, metacognitive monitoring focuses on the monitoring of individual' s cognitive ac- tivities. Judgment of Learning( JOL) is an important subskill of metacognitive monitoring. This study compared the monitoring accuracy of JOL between the classic noun memory task and a more social demanding new task using face - name memory paradigm. Indicated by three indexes( relevant meta- accuracy, absolute meta- accuracy, global meta- accuracy), the results showed that monitoring accuracy of JOL was significantly better in face - name memory task than in the noun - noun memory task. The results implies that individual's monitoring of their cognitive activities is more accurate when the task itself has stronger social adaptation meaning, suggesting that meta - cognitive monitoring skills are not only affected by the individual's own learning and development,but also may be related to the long - term evolution of human beings.
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第2期131-139,共9页 Psychological Exploration
关键词 学习判断 元认知监测 人脸识别 社会适应 judgment of learning metacognitive monitoring face recognition social adaptation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献18

  • 1王文宇.观念、策略与英语词汇记忆[J].外语教学与研究,1998,30(1):49-54. 被引量:620
  • 2吴霞,王蔷.非英语专业本科学生词汇学习策略[J].外语教学与研究,1998,30(1):55-59. 被引量:658
  • 3Nelson T O, Narens L. Why investigate metacognition? In Metcalfe J, Shimamura A P. Eds. Metacognition: Knowing about knowing. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1994, 1-25 被引量:1
  • 4Goodman L A, Kruskal W H. Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Associations, 1954, 49 : 732 - 764 被引量:1
  • 5Nelson T O. A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling- of - knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 1984, 95 : 109 - 133 被引量:1
  • 6Nelson T O, Narens L, Dunlosky J. A revised methodology for research, on metamemory: Pre- judgment recall and monitoring (PRAM). Psychological Methods. 2004, 9 ( 1 ): 53 - 69 被引量:1
  • 7Maki R H, Shields M, Wheeler A E,Zacchilli T L. Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2005, 97(4) : 723 -731 被引量:1
  • 8Runlus,D.Maintenancerehearsalandsinglelevelprocessing.JournalofVerbalLearningandVerbalBehavior,1977;16;65-681 被引量:1
  • 9Mazuryk,G.F.Positiverecencyinfinalfreerecall,JournalofExperimentalPsychology,1974;103;812-814 被引量:1
  • 10Mery,R.Keywordlearningandchildren'svocabularylearningintheclassroom,BritishJournalofEducationalPsychology,1980;50:123-136 被引量:1

共引文献27

同被引文献91

引证文献5

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部