摘要
《物权法》第149条第1款的自动续期规则具有溯及力,且不允许当事人通过土地出让合同排除适用;该规则与《房地产管理法》第22条并不冲突,作为新法的后者应当理解为仅适用于非住宅建设用地。在现行法律框架内,住宅建设用地使用权的自动续期问题仍是个无解命题,未来民法典解决该问题不能仅借助私法理论,其更大程度上是一个政治命题。虽然采纳"无偿自动续期论"或"有偿自动续期论"只是立法政策的不同选择而已,但基于民意、社会效果、土地制度改革、国家财政、司法实务等现实因素的考量,立法宜采纳土地一律国有化前提下的"房屋安全年限内免费自动续期"方案。
The automatic renewal rule of Article 149,paragraph 1,of the Property Law is retrospective and does not allow the parties to exclude the application through the land transfer contract.The rule also does not conflict with Article22 of the Urban Real Estate Administration Act,because the latter as a new rule only apply to non-residential construction land.In the existing legal framework,the automatic renewal of the right to use residential construction land is still a proposition that has no solution,the future civil code to solve the problem can not only rely on private law theory,and it is a political proposition in higher level actually.Although the adoption of'free automatic renewal theory'or'paid automatic renewal theory'is only a different choice of legislative policy,but based on public opinion,social effects,land system reform,national finance,judicial practice and other practical factors,the legislator should adopt'free automatic renewal within the house’s safe-use period'under the premise of all the land will be nationalized.
出处
《云南社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第2期105-113,共9页
Social Sciences in Yunnan
基金
海南大学中西部计划学科重点领域建设项目"中国农村土地法律制度完善与创新"(项目号:ZXBJH-XK016)的阶段性成果
