摘要
从作为公众参与的协商民主出发,本文考察中国语境下领导干部的协商民主实施满意度在公众协商途径及其实施周期,以及不同职务级别、单位类型和地区之间是否存在显著差异。结果表明:厅局级干部的协商民主实施满意度比科级和县处级干部高;党政部门实施决策听证会、党务会议、收集民意的周期越短,领导干部对协商民主实施越满意,但接待信访群众越频繁满意度越低;人大、政协、法检及群团组织实施决策听证会、接待信访、热线电话、网络问政和群众评议获得的满意度在不同实施周期之间无显著差别;政协领导干部经常收集民意比偶尔收集民意所获得的协商满意度要高;东部地区领导干部的协商民主实施满意度比西部地区高。面向协商民主的可持续发展,特别需要调动基层领导干部运用协商民主的积极性,强化党政机构实施协商民主的主动性,重视公众主动发起而党政机构和领导干部被动卷入的公众协商途径。
This paper examines how the satisfaction of the implementation of deliberative democracy for cadres differs in the following aspects: the execution period,the position levels of cadres,the administration units and the administrational regions. We carried out an empirical research revealing that the satisfaction of the implementation of deliberative democracy among bureau-level cadres is higher than the cadres on division-level and section-level,particularly in western regions. And the more frequence of policy hearing,public visiting and opinion collecting,the higher of satisfaction of deliberative democracy,while less satisfied with more petition letters. Our research also explores that the CPPCC cadres can achieve higher satisfaction with more frequent public opinion collecting and there is higher deliberative democracy satisfaction in eastern regions than western. In the long run,promoting deliberative democracy requires favorable political,economic and social conditions for its implementation. And it is necessary to motivate the cadres at the basic level to develop deliberative democracy and enhance the Party and government organizations' initiatives to put deliberative democracy into practice.
出处
《国家行政学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期120-124,共5页
Journal of China National School of Administration
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"健全社会主义协商民主制度研究"(13!ZZ033)
国家社科基金青年项目"群体性事件政策议程学发生机制与治理研究"(14CGL038)
中国博士后第九批特别资助(2016T90866)
四川大学青年学术人才项目(SKQX201306)
关键词
公众协商途径
协商民主实施满意度
领导干部
方差分析
Public Deliberation
Satisfaction of Deliberative Democracy
Cadres
Analysis of Variance
