期刊文献+

双腔胃管代替传统胸腔引流管在胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的应用 被引量:11

Application of double-channel nasogastric tube instead of traditional chest drainage tube in thoracoscopic lobectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨在胸腔镜下肺叶切除术中用双腔胃管代替传统胸腔引流管的可行性及优势。方法回顾性分析自2015年7月-2016年4月胸腔镜下肺叶切除患者106例,随机分为实验组及对照组各53例,分别应用16F双腔胃管及28F传统胸腔引流管,对比术后留置16F双腔胃管与传统28F胸腔引流管患者的术后疼痛、引流效果、术后相关并发症等数据,从而判断胃管在引流方面的临床效果。结果实验组(胃管组)在术后第1 d、2 d、3 d疼痛程度、皮下气肿发生率、拔管后气胸的复发率、引流管口愈合时间及引流管口持续渗出时间均较对照组(传统胸腔引流管组)低(P<0.05),在引流效果、更换引流管率、胸腔感染率、带管及住院天数上均无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论双腔胃管代替传统胸腔引流管在胸腔镜肺叶切除临床应用中具有疼痛小、可有效防止管腔堵塞、引流效果满意、术后恢复快的优势。 Objective To investigate the feasibility and advantages of nasogastric tube application in thora- coscopic lobectomy instead of traditional chest drainage tube. Methods 106 patients operated with thoracoscopic lo- bectomy from July 2015 to April 2016 were selected, and they were randomly divided into the experimental group and control group, 53 cases in each group. 16F double-channel nasogastric tube and 28F traditional chest drainage tube were applied in the two groups, respectively. Postoperative pain, the effect of drainage, postoperative complications and other data of patients who were treated with 16F double-channel nasogastric tube and 28F traditional chest drain- age tube were compared, respectively, in order to determine the clinical effect of nasogastric tube in drainage aspect. Results The degree of pain, recurrence of pneumothorax after extubation, healing time of drainage entrance, subcu- taneous emphysema incidence rate, and exudation duration of drainage entrance 1,2, and 3 d after the surgery in the experimental group were lower than in the control group (P 〈 0. 05). However, there was no significant difference in drainage effect, replacement rate of drainage tube, chest infection rate, tube holding and hospital stay between the two groups (P 〉 0. 05). Conclusion The application of double-channel nasogastric tube instead of traditional chest drainage tube in thoracoscopic lobectomy has many advantages of minimal pain, lumen blocking prevention, satisfac- tory drainage effect and rapid recovery.
出处 《临床肺科杂志》 2017年第4期689-692,共4页 Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
关键词 双腔胃管 胸腔引流管 胸腔镜 double-channel nasogastric tube chest drainage tube thoracoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献72

  • 1赵国强,高新芳,邹芳.改良胸腹联合切口贲门癌术后不放置胸腔闭式引流管106例临床分析[J].中国现代医学杂志,2005,15(3):440-441. 被引量:2
  • 2贺青卿,姜军,杨新华,范林军,郭美琴,张毅.经肋间隙入路行内乳淋巴结活检的探讨[J].中华普通外科杂志,2006,21(9):634-636. 被引量:9
  • 3江志伟,李宁,黎介寿.快速康复外科的概念及临床意义[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(2):131-133. 被引量:1358
  • 4Ferreira-Valente M A, Pais-Ribeiro J L, Jensen M P. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales [J]. Pain, 2011,152(10) : 2399-2404. 被引量:1
  • 5Herr K A, Spratt K, Mobily P R, et al. Pain intensity assessment in older adults: use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults [J]. Clin J Pain, 2004,20(4) :207-219. 被引量:1
  • 6Miro J, Castarlenas E, Huguet A. Evidence for the use of a numerical rating scale to assess the intensity of pediatric pain [J]. Eur J Pain, 2009, 13(10) : 1089-1095. 被引量:1
  • 7Miro J, Huguet A, Nieto R, et al. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and preference for a pain intensity scale for use with the elderly [J]. J Pain, 2005,6( 11 ) :727-735. 被引量:1
  • 8Breivik E K, Bjornsson G A, Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data [J]. Clin J Pain, 2000, 16( 1 ) :22-28. 被引量:1
  • 9Weber M, Schuz J, Kuball J, et al. Pain assessment in invasive diagnostic procedures. Comparison of an eleven-point numerical rating scale and a six-point verbal rating scale for pain measurement in bone marrow puncture [J]. Schmerz, 2005,19(6) :513-516,518-519. 被引量:1
  • 10Philip B K. Parametric statistics for evaluation of the visual analog scale [J]. Anesth Analg, 1990,71(6) :710. 被引量:1

共引文献706

同被引文献95

引证文献11

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部