摘要
证据与待证的主要事实之间的联系有直接也有间接,这构成了区分直接证据与间接证据的客观基础。主要事实是与法律要件相当的具体的生活事实,判断、检验是否存在直接证据的标准和依据在于是否存在可以直接证明主要事实的证据。在民事诉讼实务中,一些证据可以用来直接证明主要事实,甚至一个直接证据可以单独证明主要事实的存在与否,因而直接证据是真实存在的。区分直接与间接证据时,采用单一的分类标准,即只是把能否直接证明主要事实作为区分这两种证据的标准,比采用直接、单独双重分类标准更为可取。
Evidence and the facts to be proved are directly or indirectly associated, which constitutes the objective basis to differentiate direct evidence and indirect evidence. The main facts mean the detailed daily facts equivalent to the legal components, and to judge whether one piece of evidence constitutes direct evidence depends on whether it could directly prove the main facts. In the practice of civil litigations, some evidence could be used to directly prove the main facts, and sometimes, even one single evidence could decide whether the main facts of a case exist or not. Consequently, we may conclude that direct evidence really exists. When we differentiate evidence, I personally believe that adopting the single classification standard is much better than adopting the direct and single double classification standard, which means whether a piece of evidence is direct evidence only depends on whether it could prove the main facts of a case.
出处
《中外法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期212-229,共18页
Peking University Law Journal
关键词
直接证据
间接证据
分类标准
Direct Evidence
Indirect Evidence
Classification Standard
