摘要
目的:探讨高、低批判性思维倾向个体对肯定词、否定词的词义加工差异,推断其使用频率差异。方法:采用批判性思维倾向量表中文版本(Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version,CTDI-CV)对300名大学生进行测量,以27%为标准确定高分组和低分组被试,然后从中随机选取高批判性思维倾向组和低批判性思维倾向组,采用Stroop任务变式,比较两组被试在判断类词汇词义加工上的差异。结果:低批判性思维倾向个体对肯定词的颜色命名反应时更长。结论:与高批判性思维倾向者相比,低批判性思维倾向的个体对肯定词的自动化加工水平更高,这或许与低批判性思维倾向个体对认知加工过程的监控和调节较少,对自己和他人的观点经常持赞同和肯定态度有关。
Objective： To investigate the effects of critical thinking disposition on sematic processing of judging words. Methods： 300 college students were divided into High and Low critical thinking disposition groups by Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory-Chinese Version（CTDI-CV）, and asked to complete a revised Stroop task. Results： Compared to in-dividual with low critical thinking disposition, the group with low critical thinking disposition showed longer reaction time on the affirmative color naming task. Conclusion： Critical thinking disposition may influence judgement of processing on the affirmative words.
出处
《中国临床心理学杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2017年第1期25-27,共3页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金
国家社会科学基金教育学青年课题"移动社交网络对青少年自我控制的影响研究"(CBA150157)
关键词
批判性思维倾向
STROOP效应
词义加工
Critical thinking disposition
Stroop effect
The processing of judging words meaning
