期刊文献+

认知诊断模型资料拟合检验方法和统计量 被引量:2

Model-data fit test methods and statistics for cognitive diagnostic models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 认知诊断模型界定了测验题目和所考察属性之间的关系,通过被试的作答反应获取被试对属性或知识技能的掌握情况。认知诊断模型资料拟合检验可以从项目拟合、模型绝对拟合、模型相对拟合和个人拟合方等方面进行。通过对认知诊断拟合检验方法和统计量的详细介绍和评价,可为认知诊断实践提供借鉴和参考。未来研究可在更丰富的研究条件下对各统计量的性能进行评价和对比,完善已有的拟合检验方法,提出新的拟合统计量。 Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) are one family of psychometric models developed primarily for assessing examinees' mastery and non-mastery of skills or attributes. The extent to which the cognitive diagnosis models' hypotheses fit the real response patterns substantially influences the validity of cognitive diagnostic evaluation. The model-data fit tests in cognitive diagnostic theory are typically based on the item fit tests, the overall fit tests and the person fit tests. Comprehensive and structural introduction and evaluation of the model-data fit test methods and related statistics are intended to aid the future cognitive diagnostic studies and practice. Directions of future researches on model-data fit for cognitive diagnosis models include further inspection of the evaluation and comparison of fit test statistics under more complex simulation conditions, the improvement of the existing fit statistics and the development of novel fit statistics.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第12期1946-1960,共15页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31371047)资助
关键词 认知诊断模型 拟合检验 项目拟合 总体拟合 个人拟合 cognitive diagnostic models test of model-data fit item fit overall fit person fit
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献117

  • 1林海菁,丁树良.具有认知诊断功能的计算机化自适应测验的研究与实现[J].心理学报,2007,39(4):747-753. 被引量:21
  • 2Ackerman, T. A., Gierl, M. J., & Walker, C. M. Using multidimen- sional item response theory to evaluate educational and psychologi- cal Tests. MIRT Instructional Module/Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2003 : 37 - 53. 被引量:1
  • 3Armstrong, R. D., & Little, J. The assembly of multiple form struc- tures. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Coun- cil on Measurement in Education. 2003, April. 被引量:1
  • 4Breithaupt, K., & Hare, D. R. Automated simultaneous assembly of multistage testlets for a high-stakes licensing exam. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2007:67, 5-20. 被引量:1
  • 5Briggs, D. C., & Weeks, J. P. The sensitivity of value-added model- ing to the creation of a vertical score scale. Education Finance and Policy, 2009,4(4), 384-414. 被引量:1
  • 6Cai, L. High-dimensional exploratory item factor analysis by a Me- tropolis - Hastings Robbins - Monro algorithm. Psychometrika, 2010a,75(1), 33-57. 被引量:1
  • 7Cai, L. Metropolis-Hastings Robbins-Monro algorithm for confir- matory item factor analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20lOb, 35(3), 307-335. 被引量:1
  • 8Cai, L., Yang, J. S., & Hansen, M. Generalized full-information item bifactor analysis. Psychological Methodsm, 2011, 16(3), 221-248. 被引量:1
  • 9Cheng, Y. Computerized adaptive testing~new developments and applications. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. 2008. 被引量:1
  • 10Cheng, Y. When cognitive diagnosis meets computerized adaptive testing: CD-CAT. Psychometrika, 2009,74, 619-632. 被引量:1

共引文献45

同被引文献14

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部