期刊文献+

认知诊断模型下整体和项目拟合指标 被引量:4

Global Fit Indices and Item-Fit Indices for Cognitive Diagnostic Models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 认知诊断模型能否拟合测验数据,直接决定诊断结果的准确性。目前国内鲜有研究涉及认知诊断测验下的模型-资料拟合检验。文章将模型整体拟合指标及基于PPMC的项目拟合指标应用于认知诊断模型-资料拟合检验。模拟研究基于DINA,R-DINA和R-RUM三个诊断模型检验各拟合指标的表现。结果显示整体和项目拟合指标在识别数据产生模型时皆有较高准确率。采用整体和项目拟合指标比较了三个竞争模型与Tatsuoka带分数减法数据的拟合情况,显示R-RUM拟合最好。 One key issue in cognitive diagnostic assessement(CDA) is to select a suitable diagnostic model for a specific test. Mismatch between diagnostic model and test data world lead to decreasing classification accuracy, At present, few studies have addressed model - data fit criterion for CDA. Based on posterior predictive model checking(PPMC), this study introduces several global fit indices and item - fit indices for model evaluations in CDA. The global fit indexes may provide information for answering the question as to the utility of the data for analysis by the model. The item - fit indexes are used to determine the interaction between the item responses and skills that each item is designed to measure. Simulation and real - data studies are conducted to examine the performance of these indices on three CDMs. The simulation results indicate that: ( 1 ) global fit indices are almost able to identify the simulation models and detect poor - fitting models ; ( 2 ) the item fit indices were able to identify fitting items and detect poor - fitting items. The results from real - data analysis indicate that:( 1 )according to BIC and DIC4and global G2, the R- RUM performed best followed by R- DINA model, and DINA model worst ; (2) for the number of item fit, the R - RUM and the R - DINA model also outperform the DINA model. s :
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第1期79-83,共5页 Psychological Exploration
基金 全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题(DHA150285)
关键词 认知诊断模型 DINA R-DINA R-RUM 后验预测模型检查 带分数减法数据 cognitive diagnostic model DINA R - DINA R - RUM posterior predictive model checking fraction subtraction data
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献120

  • 1戴海崎,张青华.规则空间模型在描述统计学习模式识别中的应用研究[J].心理科学,2004,27(4):949-951. 被引量:39
  • 2康春花,戴海崎.采用LLTM作测量与认知结合研究的初步探讨[J].心理科学,2001,24(5):569-572. 被引量:17
  • 3丁树良,罗芬.求偏序关系Hasse图的算法[J].江西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2005,29(2):150-152. 被引量:12
  • 4黄山,瞿笔玄,顾秋艳,曹亦薇.(2008).贝叶斯网络模型在阅读理解测验中的应用.云南昆明,第八届全国教育与心理统计测量学术年会. 被引量:1
  • 5涂冬波,漆书青.(2008).认知诊断计量模型的开发及应用.中国科技论文在线.2009.08.30取自http://www.paper999.com/paper_nozb5c/. 被引量:1
  • 6谢典佑,吴任婕,郭伯臣,许天维.(2008).以贝氏网络与区块平衡为基础之适性选题策略.云南昆明,第八届全国教育与心理统计测量学术年会. 被引量:1
  • 7Almond, R. G., DiBcllo, L., Moulder, B., & Zapata-Rivcra, J. D. (2007).. Modeling diagnostic assessments with Bayesian networks. Journal of Educational Measurement 44, 341-359. 被引量:1
  • 8DiBello, L. W., & Stout. W. (2007). Editors' Introduction and overview: IRT-based cognitive diagnostic models and related methods. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44. 285-291. 被引量:1
  • 9DiBello, L. W., Stout, W. F., & Roussos, L. A. (1995). Unified cognitive/psychometric diagnosis assessment likelihood-based classification techniques. In: Nichols, P. D., Chipman, S. F., & Brennan, R. L., (Eds). Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment (pp.361-389). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 被引量:1
  • 10Fischer, G. H. (1973). The linear logistic test model as an instrument in educational research. Acta Psychologica, 37. 359-374. 被引量:1

共引文献90

同被引文献33

引证文献4

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部