期刊文献+

西方主流国际关系学界对后冷战时期中美关系的认知 被引量:1

Mainstream Cognitions of the Western Academia of International Relations on Sino-American Relations in the Post-Cold War Era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以现实主义、自由主义两大国际关系理论范式为标准,分类梳理和分析了后冷战时期西方主流国际关系学界对中美关系的认知。从对中美关系的认知态度上看,现实主义和自由主义理论范式各自又可以分为积极论和消极论两类观点,这样就形成了现实主义积极论、现实主义消极论、自由主义积极论、自由主义消极论四种观点。四种类型的观点对美国的对华政策都有一定影响。四种类型的观点既有合理性又各有不足。一些西方研究者从西方的视角和利益出发难免对中国存在一定的偏见和误解。 The paper classifies and analyses mainstream views on Sino-American relations in the Post-Cold War Era in the Western Academia of International Relations based on theories of realism and liberalism, the two leading theoretical paradigms of international relations. In terms of cognitive attitude, the paradigms of realism and liberalism can respectively be classified into positive and negative opinions, forming four types of opinions (realism positive opinion, realism negative opinion, liberalism positive opinion, liberalism neg- ative opinion). All of the four different types of opinions, having both rationalities and deficiencies, influ- ence US' policy toward China to different degrees. Some Western researchers inevitably hold bias and mis- understanding to China due to their Western viewpoint and interests.
作者 石冬明
机构地区 北京大学
出处 《太平洋学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第1期48-58,共11页 Pacific Journal
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目"未来十年中国外交和战略体系构建研究--战略调整与外交改革(2015-2025)"(2014AZD059) 黑龙江省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目"良性互动与中美新型大国关系构建"(12542312)
关键词 西方主流国际关系学界 国际关系理论范式 后冷战 中美关系 认知 Western academia of International Relations theoretical paradigm of international relations post-Cold War Sino-American relations cognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1Michael D. Intriligator,Dagobert L. Brito.Nuclear proliferation and the probability of nuclear war[J].Public Choice.1981(2) 被引量:1
  • 2Jacek Kugler,Ronald L Tammen,and Brian Efird.“Integrating Theory and Policy:Global Implications of War in Iraq,”[].International Studies Review.2004 被引量:1
  • 3National Intelligence Council. Mapping the Global Future . 被引量:1
  • 4Ronald Tammen et al.Power Transitions:Strategies for the 21st Century。[].. 被引量:1
  • 5Bueno de Mesquite et al.War and Reason ([]..1992 被引量:1
  • 6John Mearsheimer.The Tragedy of Great Power Politics[]..2001 被引量:1
  • 7National Intelligence Council.Mapping the Global Future ([].Power Transitions;Strategies for the st Century.2004 被引量:1
  • 8K.W.Deutsch et al.Political Community and The North Atlantic Area ([]..1957 被引量:1
  • 9Robert Keohane.AfterHegemony:Co-operation and Discord in the World Political Economy[]..1984 被引量:1
  • 10Yi Feng.Democracy,Governance and Economic Performance;Theory,Data Analysis and Case Studies ([]..2003 被引量:1

共引文献28

同被引文献20

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部