摘要
"■"在北魏至隋朝石刻文献中是"瓊(琼)"的讹字;在佛教文献中为国名于阗之"阗"的讹字。二者同字形不同音义,属同形字。朝鲜本《龙龛手镜》以"■"为"瑱"字的说法,宜阙疑待考。"瓊(琼)"有■"?"等异体,可知发展为"鼃"字不难。
This paper argues that the character ■in the stone inscriptions from the Northern Wei Dynasty to the Sui Dynasty should be a variant of 瓊( qiong). The variants of 瓊, like and ?, may be the origins of ■. The character ■is also used as a variant of 阗( dian) in于阗( yudian, state name) in Buddhist literature. The two variants share the same graph, but have different pronunciations and meanings. The interpretation of ■as 瑱( dian) in Korean version of longkan shoujing( 龙龛手镜) should be re-investigated.
出处
《中国语文》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第1期112-120,共9页
Studies of the Chinese Language
基金
韶关市哲学社会科学规划项目“隋唐石刻文献词语汇考”(Z2014004)
教育部人文社科青年项目“隋唐石刻文献字词研究”(14YJC740094)
国家社会科学基金重大项目“秦汉六朝字形全谱”(13&ZD131)的支持
关键词
字词关系
璸
瑱
(琼)
glyph evolution
■(qiong)
瑱(dian)
瓊(qiong)
