摘要
目的 了解摩托车驾驶员酒后驾驶行为危险因素。方法 将南京市3次路面拦截机动车调查酒后驾驶行为获得的摩托车驾驶员数据合并,进行分析。结果 筛选符合条件的摩托车驾驶员468人,酒后驾驶57人（12.18%）,饮酒驾驶44人（9.40%）,醉酒驾驶1人（0.21%）。外地牌照摩托车驾驶员酒后驾驶发生率为20.25%,高于本地车辆（χ^2=5.792,P=0.016）;周末和节假日酒后驾驶发生率分别为17.79%、25.00%,高于工作日（χ^2=9.287,P=0.010）;教育程度越高酒后驾驶发生率越低（χ^2=18.887,P〈0.01）。多因素Logistic回归结果显示,以18-30岁年龄组为参照,31-40岁年龄组OR值为4.342（95%CI：1.582-11.912）,41-50岁年龄组OR值为12.560（95%CI：4.578-34.455）,51-66岁年龄组OR值为12.616（95%CI：3.594-44.281）;次驾车时间〉0.5h为参照,驾驶时间≤0.5h的OR值为3.884（95%CI：1.262-11.954）;以一般点为参照,高危点的OR值为2.549（95%CI：1.122-5.794）;以下午时间（13：00—14：30）为参照,晚上（20：00—22：00）OR值为9.702（95%CI：1.275-73.811）,深夜（22：00-）OR值为23.389（95%CI：2.752-198.753）;以戴头盔为参照,不戴头盔OR值为2.706（95%CI：1.366-5.359）。结论 摩托车驾驶员酒后驾驶发生率较高,影响因素较为复杂,相关部门应针对其危险因素采取人群干预和加强执法活动。
Objective To understand the risk factors related to drink-driving among motorcyclists. Methods Data of motorcyclists in 3 drink driving surveys carried out by policemen who stopped drink-driving in Nanjing were collected and analyzed. Results A total of 468 eligible motorcyclists were selected. Among these motorcyclists, 57 （ 12. 18% ） motor- cyclists had drink-driving, 44 （9.40%） motorcyclists had drink-driving under the influence of alcohol and 1 （0. 21% ） motorcyclists had drunk driving while intoxicated. Among motorcyclist who had drink-driving, the percentage of not having local driving license was 20. 25%, which was significantly higher than that of local motorcyclist （ χ^2=5. 792, P = 0. 016）. The drink driving rate was 17.79% at weekends and 25.00% at holidays, which was significantly higher than that in weekdays （χ^2=9. 287, P = 0. 010）. The drink driving rate was significantly lower when divers had higher level of education （χ^2=18. 887, P 〈0. 01 ）. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the Odds Ratio （OR） value was 4. 342 （95% CI：1. 582 - 11. 912） for aged 31 -40, the OR value was 12. 560 （95% CI：4. 578 -34. 455） for aged 41 -50, and the OR value was 12. 616 （95% CI：3. 594 -44. 281） for aged 51 -66 when using aged 18 -31 as control group. When using driving time more than half an hour as control group, the OR value for driving more than half an hour was 3. 884 （95% CI： 1. 262- 11. 954）. Also, when using regular survey spot as control group, the OR value was 2. 549 （95% CI： 1. 122 - 5. 794） for the high risk survey spot. While using survey time between 13：00 and 14：30 as control group, the OR value was 9. 702 （95% CI： 1. 275 - 73. 811 ） for survey time between 20 ： 00 and 22 ： 00 and the OR value was 23. 389 （ 95% CI： 2. 752 - 198. 753） for survey time after 22：00. At the meanwhile, when wearing helmet as control group, the OR value was 2. 706 （95 % CI： 1. 366 -5. 359） for not wearing helmet. Conclusio
作者
张凤云
曲晨
季莉莉
杨国平
李小宁
朱琳
朱海
ZHANG Feng- yun QU Chen Jl Li-li YANG Guo-ping LI Xiao-ning ZHU Lin ZHU Hai(Health Education Institute, Jiangsu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing 210009, China)
出处
《中国健康教育》
北大核心
2016年第12期1077-1081,共5页
Chinese Journal of Health Education
基金
国际理性饮酒联盟(IARD)减少有害饮酒全球行动:酒后驾驶干预项目
江苏省卫生厅重大科研项目(H201412)
