摘要
科学计量指标可以客观反映期刊的质量和影响,是期刊评价和科研管理工作的重要工具,其科学性和有效性的前提是学术期刊坚守出版诚信,尊重知识的原始分布状态和传播过程。一些期刊采取人为调整指标的方式,企图操纵期刊的评价结果。这样的行为可以通过对科学计量指标的分析发现。本文通过对"引导作者增加不必要引用"、"互引"、"在影响因子时间窗口内外调节自引"等行为进行剖析发现:结合使用不同指标能更加客观科学地评估学术期刊的全面情况,操纵指标的行为很容易就被识破和曝光,因此学术期刊办刊人要坚守诚信底线,拒绝尝试弄虚作假。
Scientific measurement indicators reflect the quality and impact of the journal, is an important tool for journal evaluation and management of scientific research. Their scientific and validity because the premise that academic journals adhere to the publishing integrity and respecting original distribution and diffusion of knowledge. Some journals take the form of artificial adjusted indicators to manipulate the results. Such behavior can be found through an analysis of scientific measurement. Paper analysis 3 kind of behaviors such as ＂ guide author increased not necessary citations＂ , and ＂ increase not necessary mutual citations＂ , and ＂ regulation self - citations both inside and outside Impact Factor＇s calculating window ＂. Which is found that combined using different index can added objective science to assessment academic journals of full situation, manipulation index of behavior is easy on was through and exposure, so academic published workers should adhere to integrity bottom line, refused to attempts to fraud.
出处
《编辑学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第6期608-611,共4页
Acta Editologica
基金
国家社会科学基金项目资助(15BTQ036)
关键词
学术期刊
指标
学术不端
诚信
引文
academic journal
indicator
academic misconduct
publishing ethics
citations
