摘要
民事司法一直在政治理性和技艺理性间徘徊。公共理性作为民主社会公民理性的重叠共识,能够保证公众在平等协商和辩论中达成对某一纷争的共识,进而能够调和政治理性和技艺理性在民事司法中的张力。作为公共理性的重要载体,民事诉讼在程序设置方面应当符合公共理性关于伦理和制度的双向要求,这种要求应当糅合法官—当事人双方对程序的高度参与性以及克制性。诉讼模式和诚实信用作为公共理性在民事诉讼中的重要场域,当前我国的制度构建均与公共理性的要求存在巨大差距,应以诉审商谈主义为进路进行重塑。
The justice has been wavering between political rationality and technical rationality,both of which are even opposed. As the important common view,the common rationality could reach the agreement in the equal negotiation and the argument,thus,could mediate the tension of between political rationality and techaical rationality. As the important carrier of public rationality,the civil procedure should meet the requirements of ethics and system. However,the great differences between system construction and public rationality require a reconstruction in the way of argumentation on proceeding and trials.
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
2016年第6期29-35,共7页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金
2014年广东省教育厅质量工程项目<以工业法为导向的大学专业综合改革>项目的阶段性研究成果
关键词
公共理性
民事诉讼
商谈主义
诚实信用
诉讼模式
common rationality
civil procedure
argumentation on proceedings and trials
principle of good faith
construction of civil procedure
