期刊文献+

人类胚胎基因编辑研究引发的伦理关注和规制策略 被引量:15

The Ethical Concerns and Regulation Strategies Triggered by the Research on Human Embryonic Gene Editing
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国科学家发表的有关人类胚胎基因编辑研究的成果在世界科学界引发了前所未有的伦理关注,国际科学界很快对此做出预警性反应,并通过国际会议和联合声明等形式划定相关的研究"底线",禁止用于"生殖"目的的人类胚胎基因编辑研究,探讨负责任地开展人类胚胎编辑研究的规制框架。 Chinese scientists' research on human embryo genetic editing has triggered unprecedented ethical concerns all over the world , thus the inter-national scientific community soon make a precautionary response to relevant research and draw a "bottom line" for them through forms of internationalconferences and joint statements to prohibit research on human embryonic gene editing for the purpose of "reproduction", and put forward the regulatoryframework for responsibly carrying out the research on human embryo editing.
作者 李建军 王添
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第11期114-118,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 基因编辑技术 人类胚胎 伦理关注 社会规制 gene - editing technology human embryos ethical concerns social regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Francis S. Collins. Statement on NIH funding of research using gene - editing technologies in human embryos [ N ]. April 29, 2015. ht- tps://www, nih. gov/about - nih/who - we - are/nih - director/ statements/statement - nih - funding - research - using - gene - edi- ting - technologies -human - embryos. 被引量:1
  • 2赵欣,赵迎泽.对话周琪:华盛顿共识[J].科学通报,2016,61(3):283-284. 被引量:9
  • 3Erika Check Hayden. Should you edit your children' s genes? Na-.ture,530,402 -405,February 23,2016. http://www, nature, eom/ news/should - you - edit - your - children - s - genes - 1. 19432. 被引量:1
  • 4红枫.你会改变孩子的基因吗?残疾人应否使用编辑技术引发大讨论[N].中国科学报,2016-3-3.http://news.aciencenet.cn/htmlnews/2016/3/339574.shtm. 被引量:1
  • 5David Baltimore, Paul Berg et al. A prudent path forward for genom- ie engineering and germline gene modification [ J]. Science ,2015 (April 03) :26 -28. 被引量:1
  • 6李建军,唐冠男.阿希洛马会议:以预警性思考应对重组DNA技术潜在风险[J].科学与社会,2013,3(2):98-109. 被引量:10
  • 7Paul Berg and Maxine F. Singer: The recombinant DNA controver- sy: Twenty years later[J]. Science, 1995 (9) : 9011 -9013. 被引量:1
  • 8邱仁宗.人胚基因修饰的科学与伦理对话[N].健康报,2015-05-08(005).http://www.jkb.com.cn/medicalHumanities/2015/0508/368639.html. 被引量:1
  • 9R. Isasi, E. Kleiderman and B. M. Knoppers. Editing policy to fit the genome[ J]. Science, 2016 ( 1 ) : 337 - 339. http://science, sci- enccmag, org/content/351/6271/337. 被引量:1

二级参考文献17

  • 1Priska Gisler,Monika Kurath. Paradise Lost? "Science" and "the Public" after Asilomar[J].Science Technology & Human Values,2011,(02):213-243. 被引量:1
  • 2丽莎·杨特.现代遗传学-设计生命.邹晨霞译邹晨霞译[M].{H}上海:上海科学技术出版社,200819-22. 被引量:1
  • 3Susan Wright. Molecular politics:developing American and British regulatory policy for genetic engineering,1972-1982[M].{H}Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1994.129. 被引量:1
  • 4Maxine Singer,Dieter S?ll. Guidelines for DNA hybrid molecules[J].{H}SCIENCE,1973,(4105):1114. 被引量:1
  • 5Paul Berg. Potential Biohazard of Recombinant DNA Molecules[J].{H}SCIENCE,1974,(4148):303. 被引量:1
  • 6Paul Berg,Maxine F.Singer. The recombinant DNA controversy:Twenty years later[J].{H}Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences(USA),1995,(09):9011-9013. 被引量:1
  • 7Seldom Krimsky. Genetic Alchemy:A Social History of the Recombinant DNA Controversy[M].{H}Cambridge:The MIT Press,1982.129-130. 被引量:1
  • 8Susan Wright. Legitimating Genetic Engineering:Perspectives in Biology and Medicine[J].{H}Springer,2001,(02):235-247. 被引量:1
  • 9J Watson. A imaginary monster[J].{H}Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists,1977,(05):12-13. 被引量:1
  • 10M.Rogers. The Pandor's Box Congress[J].Rolling Stone,1975.37-40,42,74,77-78,82. 被引量:1

共引文献16

同被引文献153

引证文献15

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部