期刊文献+

认真回顾研究史重视RUCAM量表在药物性肝损伤诊断中的应用 被引量:10

Carefully reviewing the history of diagnostic scales and paying more attention to the diagnostic value of Roussel-Uclafcausality assessment method scale for drug-induced liver injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 当前,在我国提交的有关临床药物性肝损伤(DILI)研究及相关文献中,相关的诊断标准采用非常混乱,使这些研究的结果、结论和经验无从比较和推广,因此,有必要认真回顾诊断量表的发展历史,统一标准和相关认识。RUCAM量表白1993年问世以来,不论是在文献中,还是在对有可能引起DILI的药物调控决策方面,已广泛用于评估因果关系,为临床医师提供一种诊断DILI的有益分析构架。除非将来发现具有明确诊断意义的标志物,目前仍应采用RUCAM作为DILI的因果关系评估和辅助诊断量表。 Currently, the diagnostic criteria for drug-induced liver injury (DILI) used in the clinical studies and related literature in China are very confusing, making it difficult to compare and extend the use of the results, conclusions, and experience of these studies. Therefore, it is necessary to carefully review the developmental history of diagnostic scales and unify the diagnostic criteria and related knowledge of DILI. Since its publication in 1993, Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM) scale has been widely used to assess the causality between drugs and liver injury, both in DILI studies and decisions on the regulation of drugs which may cause liver injury, in order to provide a useful analytical framework for clinical physicians in the diagnosis of DILI. At present, RUCAM scale should still be used to assess causality and assist diagnosis, unless markers with diagnostic significance are found in future.
作者 陈威伟
出处 《中华肝脏病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第11期801-803,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hepatology
关键词 肝炎 慢性 药物性 诊断 因果关系评估量表 RUCAM量表 Hepatitis, chronic, drug-induced Diagnosis Causality assessment methods RUCAM scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献60

  • 1Rolf Teschke,Christian Frenzel,Johannes Schulze,Alexander Schwarzenboeck,Axel Eickhoff.Herbalife hepatotoxicity: Evaluation of cases with positive reexposure tests[J].World Journal of Hepatology,2013,5(7):353-363. 被引量:6
  • 2Rolf Teschke,Christian Frenzel,Johannes Schulze,Axel Eickhoff.Herbal hepatotoxicity:Challenges and pitfalls of causality assessment methods[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(19):2864-2882. 被引量:9
  • 3Larrey D. Epidemiology and individual susceptibility to adverse drug reactions affecting the liver. Semin Liver Dis, 2002, 22: 145-155. 被引量:1
  • 4Amacher DE. Serum transaminase elevations as indicators of hepatic injury following the administration of drugs. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 1998, 27:119-130. 被引量:1
  • 5Andrade RJ, Lucena MI, Pachkoria K, et al. Chronic liver damage after an episode of idiosyncratic drug induced liver injury (DILI). J Hepatol, 2006, 44(suppl 2):S247. 被引量:1
  • 6Nathwani RA, Kaplowitz N. Drug hepatotoxicity. Clin Liver Dis, 2006, 10:207-217. 被引量:1
  • 7Benichou C. Criteria of drug-induced liver disorders. Report of an international consensus meeting. J Hepatol, 1990, 11 : 272-276 被引量:1
  • 8Abboud G, Kaplowitz N. Drug-induced liver injury. Drug Saf, 2007, 30:277-294. 被引量:1
  • 9Temple R. Hy's law: predicting serious hepatotoxicity. Pharmaco epidemiol Drug Saf, 2006, 15 : 241-243. 被引量:1
  • 10Poison J, Lee WM. AASLD position paper: the management of acute liver failure. Hepatology, 2005, 41 : 1179-1197. 被引量:1

共引文献357

同被引文献69

引证文献10

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部