摘要
在当下宪法学界明显出现了一股宪法保守主义的学术思潮,似乎只要一提"宪法的司法适用"或"宪法司法化",就突破了我国现行宪法确立的基本制度,从而从根本上否定了宪法司法适用的可能性。自2008年以来一些宪法学者另辟蹊径,开始重视并运用作为法律解释方法的"合宪解释",达致宪法司法适用之目的。由于合宪解释包含着解释宪法与不解释宪法的两种情形,而解释宪法情形下的合宪解释仍然与我国宪制相冲突。在我国宪制下只有采取一种不作任何宪法解释的司法适用,才能与我国宪制相契合。这种不解释宪法的方法是"非解释性宪法适用"。其正当性在于:遵循明确含义规则合乎法治要求、宪法自身对国家机关的拘束力、合乎我国宪制、宪法是最高法律规范。
There has appeared in Chinese constitutional studies a trend toward conversatism so much so that the slightest mention of 'judicial application of the constitution or constitutional judicialization seems to run counter to the established basic constitutional system or even to nagate the possibility of a constitutional judicial application. Since 2008, some constitutional scholars have begun to use the methods of legal interpretation of 'constitutional interpretation', and tried to explain in accordance with the constitution However, because 'constitutional interpretation method contains explanation and zero explanation, and constitutional explanation of the constitutional interpretation contradicts our country's constitution, the constitutional interpretation methods are not applicable in China. In China, only the Zero-interpretation application of the Constitution is suitable for China's constitutional system. Its ligitimacy lies in the requirment of clearly-defined rules, the governing of the constitution over state organs, its conformation to the Chinese constutional system, and the status of the Constitution as the supereme laws.
出处
《苏州大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期74-82,191,共9页
Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
基金
教育部人文社科基金重大项目"权利与政治研究"(项目编号:12JJD820001)的阶段性成果
关键词
宪法适用
合宪解释
合宪性推定
宪法解释
非解释性适用
constitutional application
constitutional interpretation
constitutionality presumption
constitutional interpretation
Zero-interpretation application
