摘要
在医疗损害纠纷案件中,举证责任的科学分配事关诉讼当事人的平等地位以及案件的公正审理。《侵权责任法》颁布后,我国医疗损害纠纷案件举证责任分配制度由举证倒置变为区分案件类型的举证责任制度,这从法律和现实上具有一定的合理性,但仍存在较多不足;而建立举证责任缓和制度和完善诉讼中的释明义务能使医疗损害纠纷案件的举证责任分配制度更加合理,进而可缓解医患矛盾,促进社会和谐。
In the medical damage disputes, scientific allocation of the burden of proof is closely related to the equal status of the litigant, and fair trial of the case. In China, proof burden distribution system of medical disputes damage has been changed from inversion of proof to distinguished types according to different cases, and this change has certain rationality in law and reality, but there are still many shortcomings. Thus the author argued that we build the burden of proof system of ease and improve the duty of explanation in the lawsuit, which will make the allocation of the burden of proof of medical damage cases more reasonable, thus alleviate the doctor-patient contradiction, and promote social harmony.
出处
《医学与法学》
2016年第5期37-40,共4页
Medicine and Jurisprudence
基金
四川医事卫生法治研究中心立项项目“《侵权责任法》实施背景下的医患纠纷防范与处理研究”(项目编号:YF10-Y16)的阶段性研究成果
