摘要
明清二代具有截然不同的学术特性,以传统文献学的若干主要方面考察比较,差异明显,勿庸置辩。明清最高统治者一为中原汉族,一为边疆少数民族,依中国历史通常所见及一般认识:汉族文化高于少数民族,异族入主中原建立统治之后,往往接受汉文化乃至终为同化,因此明清之别尤值得探究。其原因除前人所述学术自身演进变化之外,不能忽视蒙元影响及其造成的朱明胡化因素,另二代宫廷教育及由此形成的帝王修养的差别也产生了重要影响。从文献学领域反观学术史及一定时段历史发展,或可有所启发和增加新的认识。
The academic characteristics in the Ming and Qing dynasties are quite different,from several main aspects of the traditional philology. The sovereign rulers in the Ming Dynasty were the Han ethnic from the central plains,while their counterparts in the Qing Dynasty were the ethnic minority in the frontiers. According to Chinese history,generally speaking,the Han culture is superior to that of the ethic minority; so after entering the central plains to establish their regime,the ethic minority tended to accepting and eventually being assimilated into the Han culture. Therefore,the difference between the Ming and Qing dynasties is especially worth exploring. The causes of such differences includes not only the academic evolution studied by the previous researchers but also the effects of the Yuan Dynasty governed by Mongolians as well as the factor of the Ming people imitating the Hu（ Northern minorities）. In addition,the different imperial court education of the two dynasties and the resulting imperial cultivation difference also played an important role. Hence,The new understanding might be inspired and increased when the academic history and the historical development in a certain period of time are examined from the perspective of philology.
作者
贾二强
JIA Er-qiang(School of History and Civilization, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi＇ an 710119, Shaanxi)
出处
《陕西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期65-73,共9页
Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"清代丛书编纂与学术变迁研究"(13BZS016)
关键词
文献学
明清学术
民族
朱明胡化
宫廷教育
philology
scholarship in the Ming and Qing dynasties
nationality
the trend of the Ming people imitating Hu
the imperial court education
