期刊文献+

扩展版布罗塞特暴力风险评估量表的效度和信度 被引量:5

Validity and reliability of the Br?set Violence Checklist-Extended
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对扩展版布罗塞特暴力风险评估量表(BVC—E)进行效度和信度检验。方法:应用BVC-E对679例符合疾病和有关健康问题的国际统计分类第十次修订本(ICD-10)诊断的精神障碍患者进行评估,计算内容效度指数评价其内容效度;采用量表的灵敏度、特异度、ROC曲线下面积评价其效标效度;采用组内相关系数评价评定者间信度;计算Cronbach α系数评价内部一致性信度。结果:BVC—E量表水平的内容效度指数为0.94;以语言攻击、物品攻击、他人攻击、自身攻击作为结果变量时,ROC曲线下面积为0.941,当截断点为3时,其灵敏度高于原量表BVC(89.4%vs.78.9%,P〈0.001);以他人攻击作为结果变量时,ROC曲线下面积为0.974,当截断点为4时,其灵敏度高于原量表BVC(92.7%vs.74.5%,P〈0.001);量表各条目间的组内相关系数为0.930~0.984,总的组内相关系数为0.985;Cronbach α系数为0.732。结论:BVC—E量表在扩展后灵敏度有所提升,更能精确地预测精神科的暴力事件。 Objective: To test the validity and reliability of the BrOset Violence Checklist-Extended (BVC-E). Methods: 679 patients who met the diagnosis criteria for mental disorders according to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) were selected to be assessed with BVC-E. The content validity was evaluated by the content validity index (CVI). The criterion validity was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity and the area under the ROC curve. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to test the inter-rater reliability. The internal consistency reliability of the scale was tested by Cronbach α coefficient. Results: The scale-level CVI of the BVC-E was 0. 94, When the outcome variable was the occurrence of any verbal or nonverbal behavior that was threatening to self or others, the area under the ROC curve was 0. 941. When the cut-off was 3, the sensitivity of BVC-E was higher than that of the original scale BVC(89. 4% vs. 78.9%, P 〈 0. 001). When the outcome variable was the occurrence of any physical behavior that was threatening to others, the area under the ROC curve was 0. 974. When the cut-off was 4, the sensitivity of BVC-E was higher than that of the original scale BVC (92. 7% vs. 74. 5%, P 〈0. 001). The ICC of every item was 0. 930 -0. 984 and the overall ICC was 0. 985. The Cronbach a coefficient was 0. 732. Conclusion: The sensitivity of the scale is improved after extended and BVC-E could predict psychiatric violence more accurately.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第10期752-757,共6页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 2013年河北省卫生厅医学科学研究课题"布罗塞特暴力风险评估量表的引进与修订"(20130075)
关键词 扩展版布罗塞特暴力风险评估量表 精神科 暴力风险评估 效度 信度 Brcset Violence Checklist-Extended psychiatry violence risk assessment validity reliability
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Bjorkdahl A, Hansebo G, Palmstiema T. The influence of staff tra- ining on the violence prevention and management climate in psy- chiatric inpatient units [ J]. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs, 2013, 20 (5) : 396 - 404. 被引量:1
  • 2O'Shea LE, Picchioni MM, Mccarthy J, et al. Predictive validity of the HCR-20 for inpatient aggression: the effect of intellectual disa- bility on accuracy [J]. J Intellect Disabil Res, 2015, 59( 11): 1042 - 1054. 被引量:1
  • 3Griffith JJ, Daffem M, Godber T. Examination of the predictive va- lidity of the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression in two mental health units [J]. Int J Ment Health Nurs, 2013, 22(6):485 - 492. 被引量:1
  • 4吴宇飞,孙秀丽,李媛媛,严保平,赵素银,刘杰,崔利军,郭艳峤,李建峰,栗克清.中文版布罗塞特暴力风险评估量表的效度和信度检验[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2015,29(6):446-451. 被引量:30
  • 5Almvik R, Woods P. The Broset Violence Checklist (BVC) and the prediction of inpatient violence: some preliminary results [ J]. Psychiatr Care, 1998, 5(6) : 208 - 211. 被引量:1
  • 6Hvidhjelm J, Sestoft D, Skovgaard LT, et al. Sensitivity and speci-ficity of the Broset Violence Checklist as predictor of violence in forensic psychiatry [ J]. Nord J Psychiatry, 2014, 68(8) : 536 - 542. 被引量:1
  • 7Chan O, Chow KR. Assessment and determinants of aggression in a forensic psychiatric institution in Hong Kong, China [ J]. Psychiatry Res, 2014, 220 ( 1 ) : 623 - 630. 被引量:1
  • 8张娟,栗克清,孙秀丽.布罗塞特暴力风险评估量表在精神科应用的研究进展[J].精神医学杂志,2015,28(5):388-392. 被引量:15
  • 9世界卫生组织 范肖冬 汪向东 于欣 译.ICD-10精神与行为障碍分类临床描述与诊断要点[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1993.70-106. 被引量:46
  • 10李峥,刘宇.护理学研究方法[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:224. 被引量:38

二级参考文献134

共引文献333

同被引文献46

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部