期刊文献+

全胸腔镜与辅助小切口胸腔镜肺癌切除术效果比较 被引量:7

A comparison of VATS with minimally invasive thoracotomy for lung cancer surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较全胸腔镜与辅助小切口腔镜在肺癌切除的效果。方法:回顾性分析187例外科治疗的肺癌患者临床资料,分为全腔镜组(n=79)及小切口组(n=108),比较两组手术时间、并发症、炎症反应因子变化以及生存复发情况。结果:全腔镜组手术时间、出血量、住院时间、VAS评分均显著低于小切口组(P<0.05),两组患者淋巴结清扫数量、引流管留置时间、引流量均无统计学差异(P>0.05);全腔镜组并发症为13.9%,低于小切口组的26.9%(P<0.05);两组术后CRP、TNF-α、IL-6、IL-10均显著升高,小切口组CRP、TNF-α、IL-10升高更为显著(P<0.05),而IL-6升高水平两组无明显差异(P>0.05);平均随访时间(33.91±7.25)个月,两组1、2、3年复发及生存率无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论:全胸腔镜与小切口开胸肺癌切除均可做到彻底淋巴结清扫,有效控制复发率及死亡率。而腔镜更具微创伤、恢复快、并发症少及更低机体生物学应激反应的特点。 Objective: To compare the clinical outcome of VATS with minimally invasive thoracotomy for lung cancer surgery. Methods : All 187 patients with lung cancer were divided into VATS group ( n = 79) and minimally in-vasive thoracotomy group (n = 108) . The operation time, complications, level of inflammatory factors and survival were analyzed. Results: The operation time,volume of blood loss,day of hospital stay,VAS scores in VATS group were sig-nificantly lower than that of minimally invasive thoracotomy group (P 〈0. 05) . But there was no significant difference between two groups in the number of lymph node, time and volume of drainage( P 〉 0. 05 ) . The incidence of postoper-ative complication in the VATS group(13.9% ) was significantly lower than 26. 9% in minimally invasive thoracoto-my group ( P 〈 0. 05 ) . The level of serum CRP, TNF - α ,IL -6 ,IL -1 0 was significantly increased after operation, and CRP,TNF-a,IL - 10 were increased more significantly in the later group (P 〈0. 05) ,except IL -6 (P 〉 0. 05 ). All patients were followed - up for ( 33. 91 ± 7. 25 ) months,in average. The incidence of recurrence and sur-vival rate of 1 year and 2,3 years was no significant difference between the two groups(P 〉0.05). Conclusion: Both VATS and minimally invasive thoracotomy can achieve a complete lymphadenectomy and an effective control of mor-tality and tumor recurrence of patients with lung cancer. It seemed to be less injury, faster recovery and lower inci-dence of postoperative complications and light response of body for VATS.
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2016年第21期3398-3400,共3页 Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词 胸腔镜 肺叶切除 小切口开胸 肺癌 微创外科 临床应用 VATS, lobectomy,minimally invasive thoracotomy,lung cancer,microinvasive surgery,clinical applica-tion
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献61

  • 1傅成国,姜杰,高惠川,康健乐,吴朝辉.胸腔镜辅助小切口解剖肺叶及全肺切除术的临床研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(3):241-242. 被引量:10
  • 2王俊.电视胸腔镜在胸部疾病治疗中的应用现状[J].临床外科杂志,2005,13(6):384-385. 被引量:82
  • 3钟琰,何建行,杨运有.从清扫淋巴结角度看胸腔镜辅助手术在肺癌治疗中的应用[J].中国癌症杂志,2006,16(8):631-634. 被引量:41
  • 4Roviaro G, Rebuffat C, Varoli F, et al. Videoendoscopic pulmonary lobectomy for cancer [J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1992,2(3) : 244-247. 被引量:1
  • 5Mckenna RJ, Houch W, Fuller CB. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: Experience with 1100 cases [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2006,81(2) :421-426. 被引量:1
  • 6NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[EB/OL]. http: //www.nccn.org/clinical.asp. 被引量:1
  • 7Seder CW, Hanna K, Lucia V, et al. The safe transition from open to thoracoscopic lobectomy: A 5-year experience [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2009,88( 1 ) : 216-225. 被引量:1
  • 8Demmy TL, Curtis JJ. Minimally invasive lobectomy directed toward frail and high-risk patients: A case-control study [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 1999,68(1) : 194-200. 被引量:1
  • 9Li WW, Lee RL, Lee TW, et al. The impact of thoracic surgical access on early shoulder function: Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus posterolateral thoraeotomy [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2003,23 (3) : 390-396. 被引量:1
  • 10Ng CSH, Lee TW, Wan S, et al. Thoracotomy is associated with significantly more profound suppression in lymphocytes andnatural killer cells than video-assisted thoracic surgery following major lung resections for cancer [J]. J Invest Surg, 2005,18 (2) :81-88. 被引量:1

共引文献57

同被引文献86

引证文献7

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部