期刊文献+

权力再制与抵制的修辞策略——以杭州地铁价格听证会为例 被引量:1

Rhetorical Strategies of Power Reproduction and Resistance: A Case Study of Hangzhou Metro Price Hearing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 价格听证是话语争夺的场所,不同的利益群体利用不同的修辞和话语资源塑造利于己方的社会现实,反映自己的诉求。结合现代修辞学和批评话语分析理论,以一场地铁价格听证会为案例,分析价格协商中的修辞争夺、修辞策略及其互动特点。文章认为,权力和抵制并不是简单的二元对立,抵制也是一种权力。弱势群体的抵制虽然通常很难扭转价格上调,但是这种抵制有利于解构强势群体的话语霸权,重新塑造意识形态,促进社会的民主进程。 Price hearings are sites of discursive struggle where groups with opposing interests employ different rhetoric and discursive resources to shape reality to their advantage and make their appeals. This paper, based on a metro price hearing and, analyses the rhetoric struggles, rhetoric strategies and their interplay in the hearing from the perspectives of modern rhetoric and critical discourse analysis. It is argued that power and resistance are not simply in a binary opposition, and resistance is also a kind of power. Though resistance is hardly able to reverse the upward adjustment of price, such resistance helps to deconstruct the dominant group's discursive hegemony, reshape the ideology and thus facilitate the democratic progress.
出处 《天津外国语大学学报》 2016年第5期7-12,80,共6页 Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University
基金 福建省哲学社会科学规划一般项目"多语多模态旅游话语与福建对外形象的构建"(FJ2015B253) 福建省中青年教师教育科研项目A类项目"大学生跨文化批评性阅读能力培养研究"(JAS141080)
关键词 价格听证 权力 抵制 修辞 合法化 price hearing power resistance rhetoric legitimation
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Bowers, J. & J. Donovan. 2009. The Rhetoric of Agitation and Control[M]. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press. 被引量:1
  • 2Danet, B. 1984. Studies of Legal Discourse[J]. Text, (4): 1-3. 被引量:1
  • 3Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and Social Change[M]. Cambridge: Polity Press. 被引量:1
  • 4Farkas, K. 2013. Power and Access in the Public Hearings of City Council Meetings[J]. Discourse & Society, (4): 399-420. 被引量:1
  • 5Flowerdew, J. 1997. Reproduction, Resistance and Joint-production of Language Power: A Hong Kong Case Study[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, (27): 315-337. 被引量:1
  • 6Foucault, M. 1980. The History of Sexuality[M]. New York: Vintage. 被引量:1
  • 7Hardy, C. & N. Phillips. 1999. No Joking Matter: Discursive Struggle in the Canadian Refugee System[J]. Organization Studies, (1): 1-24. 被引量:1
  • 8O'Barr, W. 1982. Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power arid Strategy in the Courtroom[M]. New York: Academic Press. 被引量:1
  • 9Saghaye-Biria, H. 2012. American Muslims as Radicals? A Critical Discourse Analysis of the US Congressional Hearing on 'The Extent of Radicalization in the American Muslim Community and That Community's Response' [J]. Discourse & Society, (5): 508-524. 被引量:1
  • 10Spicer, A. 2005. The Political Process of Inscribing a New Technology[J]. Human Relations, (7): 867-890. 被引量:1

二级参考文献115

共引文献83

同被引文献60

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部