期刊文献+

“使用发明”的哲学思考 被引量:4

Philosophical Reflections on Invention in the Practical Use
原文传递
导出
摘要 技术人工物结构与功能的多样性,致使潜在的"使用发明"问题出场。"使用发明"是技术人工物的结构或功能在使用领域中的扩大、转换或他用,是技术发明进程中的重要组成部分,它包括"转用发明"和"用途发明"等发明形式。"使用发明"与技术人工物的结构、功能和人的意向性直接关联在一起,"转用发明"是技术人工物结构的他用,而"用途发明"是技术人工物功能的他用。从发明的逻辑看,"使用发明"既是技术发明本身的延续,又是一类技术发明演化的新图景。 The diversity of the structure and function of the technical artifact has made the potential issue of inven- tion in the practical use prominent. Invention in the practical use is the expansion, transformation or use of the structure or function of the technical artifact for other purposes. It is an important part in the process of technical invention, which includes such types as "invention by diversion" and "for-ness invention". Invention in the practi- cal use is directly connected with the structure and function of the technical artifact and human intentionality. "In- vention by diversion" means the structure of the technical artifact is used for other purposes. "For-ness invention" means its function is employed for other purposes. From the logic of technical invention, invention in the practical use is not only a continuation of technical invention itself, but also a new picture of the evolution of technical inven- tion.
作者 刘宝杰
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期78-83,共6页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金 国家社科基金青年项目"荷兰学派的技术哲学研究"(16CZX019) 山东省高校人文社会科学一般项目"技术设计过程中的伦理问题研究"(J16YA05) 中国博士后科学基金项目"中荷技术哲学研究的比较与融通"(2015M582108)
关键词 使用发明 转用发明 用途发明 结构-功能 结构-意向性 invention in the practical use invention by diversion for-ness invention structure-function structure-intentionality
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献62

  • 1阴训法,陈凡.论“技术人工物”的三重性[J].自然辩证法研究,2004,20(7):28-31. 被引量:17
  • 2Peter Kroes and Anthonie Meijers. Reply to Critics[J], Techne : Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Tech- nology,2002, 6 (2): 34-43. 被引量:1
  • 3Peter Kroes and Anthonie Meijers. The Dual Nature of Technical Artifacts-Presentation of a new Research Pro- gramme[J]. Techne : Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology,2002, 6 (2), 4-8. 被引量:1
  • 4Peter Kroes and Anthonie Meljers (eds.). Philosophy of Technical Artifacts[M]. Joint Delft-Eindhoven Research Programme 2005-2010. 被引量:1
  • 5Sven Ove Hansson (Guest Editor). Understanding Techno logical Function: Introduction to the Special Issue on the Dual Nature Programme[J]. Techne : Journal of the Socie-ty for Philosophy and Technology,2002,6 (2):1-3. 被引量:1
  • 6Carl Mitcham. Do Artifacts have Dual Natures? Two Points of Commentary on the Delft Project[J]. Techne : Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology, 2002, 6 (2):9-12. 被引量:1
  • 7Kroes P A and A W M Meijers, eds. Introduction: The Dual Nature of Technical Artefacts[J]. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2006, vol. 37, issuel:1-4. 被引量:1
  • 8Davis Baird. Thing Knowledge -Function and Truth[J]. Techne : Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Tech- nology,2002, 6 (2) :13-27. 被引量:1
  • 9Daniel Rothbart. The Dual Nature of Chemical Substance[J]. Techne : Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology,2002, 6 (2) :28- 33. 被引量:1
  • 10Kroes P A. Coherence of Structural and Functional De- scriptions of Technical Artefacts[J]. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2006,37:137-151. 被引量:1

共引文献14

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部