期刊文献+

艺术史和艺术人类学

History of Art and Anthropology of Art
下载PDF
导出
摘要 艺术史家和人类学家的目的,都是从艺术品的创作者和使用者的视角对作品进行研究,并且基于功能、意义和审美三个方面进行分析。人类学家的经验和调查结果告诉我们,首先,西方的审美范畴通常不适用于非西方艺术。其次,许多作品的语义和审美的属性在很大程度上依赖于它们所使用的材料的属性,而且据观察,未处理过的材料本身可能有重要的象征意义和美学价值。第三,一件艺术品不可能脱离它的环境而去研究它。在某些情况下,一件艺术品的周围环境与作品本身同样重要,并且促成了作品的意义。 The aim of both art historians and anthropologists is the study of art objects from the perspective of their producers and users, and to analyze them under the three aspects of function,meaning,and aesthetics. The experience and findings of ethnologists tell us,first of all,Western aesthetic categories are generally nonapplicable to non-Western art. Second,semantic and aesthetic properties of many objects depend to a large extent on the nature of the material in which they are made; it has also been observed that unworked materials per se may have a considerable symbolic and aesthetic value.Third,an art object cannot be studied out of its context. There are cases where the surroundings of an object are as important as the object itself and contribute strongly to its meaning.
出处 《内蒙古大学艺术学院学报》 2016年第3期49-52,共4页 Journal of Art College of Inner Mongolia University
关键词 艺术史 艺术人类学 美学 语境 材料 History of Art Anthropology of Art Aesthetics Context Material
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1As stated by Morphy:"The relevant set of objects for anthropological analysis must be developed independently of the European classification of objects as art."Howard Morphy,"The Anthropology of Art,"in T.Ingold(ed.)Companion Encyclopaedia of Anthropology.Humanity Culture and Social Life.London,New York,Routledge,1994,pp.648-685. 被引量:1
  • 2Morphy 1994:655. 被引量:1
  • 3P.Jan Vandenhoute"Comment on Methods of Studying Ethnological Art"by H.Haselberger.Current Anthropology 2(4):374-376.(1961).Quoted by Robert Goldwater,"Art History and Anthropology:some comparisons of methodology"in J.A.W.Forge(ed.)Primitive Art and Society.London,Oxford University Press,1973,pp.1-10. 被引量:1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部