期刊文献+

革新实验室:一种新的工作场所学习方法在中国的实践 被引量:6

Change Laboratory:the Practice of A New Method of Workplace Learning in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 拓展性学习是近年来工作场所学习中应用最广、影响最大的一种新兴学习模式,而变革实验室则是将拓展性学习应用于人才开发实践领域的一个基础模型。在实体上,它是一个嵌入在工作场所中,拥有众多干预工具,用于构建新型实践活动模式的微型试验场;在形式上,它是不同的主体在同一空间的真实情境中考察不同时间段的实践活动形式,并通过维果茨基"双重刺激"(Double stimulation method)的方法激发新思想、产生新概念,形成新实践活动,进而催生拓展性学习的一套形成性干预(formative interventions)方法。本文以中国高校KY科研团队为研究对象,尝试用革新实验室为其变革现有团队合作及学习模式,从而验证革新实验室在中国本土应用的可行性,并期望能够摸索出一套适合中国本土国情的革新实验室基模。 In recent years,develop Learning is becoming the most widely used, the greatest impact of a new learning model in workplace learning, and change laboratory study applied to talent development practices in the field of a base model. Physically, it is embedded in a workplace, with many intervention tools for building new practice mode miniature testing ground; in form, it is a different body from effects of different time periods in the same space in real-life situations the practice form and inspired by Vygotsky 'dual stimulation'(double stimulation method) method of new ideas, generate new concepts, to form a new practice, and then gave birth to expand the study of the formation of a set of interventions(formative interventions) method. Taking Chinese Universities KY research team for the study, try to change their existing innovation laboratory teamwork and learning, in order to verify the feasibility of local innovation laboratory in the application of China, and expect to be able to explore a set suitable for Chinese innovative laboratory conditions the fundamental mode.
作者 马香媛 吴刚
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第8期82-89,158-159,共8页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金 中国博士后基金项目"工作场所学习与学习变革:拓展性学习的理论及应用模型研究"(项目编号2014M561397) 以及"工作场所学习与学习变革--基于项目的行动学习(PBAL)研究"项目的支持 属于该项目研究成果的一部分
关键词 工作场所学习 革新实验室 科研合作变革 拓展性学习 workplace learning innovation laboratories scientific collaboration change develop Learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献90

  • 1丛杭青,王华平,沈琪.合作研究及其认识论评价[J].科学学研究,2004,22(5):455-459. 被引量:13
  • 2[巴]保罗·弗莱雷.被压迫者教育学[M].顾建新,等,译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2001:28-29. 被引量:17
  • 3Illeris, K. (2011 a). How we learn: Learning and non-learning in school and beyond [ M ], Beijing: Education science press, 61-62. 被引量:1
  • 4Kuutti, A. (1996). Aetivity theory as a potential framework for hu- man-computer interaction research [J].In B.Anardi (Ed.), context and eonsciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press, 17-44. 被引量:1
  • 5Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one[J].Educational Researcher, 27, 4-13. 被引量:1
  • 6Lave, J. &Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripher- al participation [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 80. 被引量:1
  • 7Illeris, K. (2011b). How we learn: Learning and non-learning in school and beyond[M], Beijing: Education science press, 23-29. 被引量:1
  • 8Engestr6m, Y. & Sannino, A. (2010a) Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges[J]. Educational Re- search Review, Vo15, 1-24. 被引量:1
  • 9海伦.瑞恩博德.艾莉森.富勒,安妮.蒙罗著,匡英译.情境中的工作场所学习[M],北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2011:159. 被引量:2
  • 10Engestrom, Y. (2008).From Teams to Knots: Activity Theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University press, 100-101. 被引量:1

共引文献124

同被引文献85

引证文献6

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部