期刊文献+

内镜黏膜下剥离术后追加胃切除术对早期胃癌患者预后的影响 被引量:29

Impact of additional gastrectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection on the prognosis of early gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后追加胃切除手术治疗是否对早期胃癌的预后有负面影响。方法回顾分析2008年1月至2014年12月间复旦大学附属中山医院内镜中心收治的经ESD治疗或胃切除手术治疗的107例早期胃癌患者临床资料,其中44例为ESD术后追加胃切除手术治疗者[ESD追加胃切除组,追加胃切除的原因为:切缘阳性10例,淋巴管或血管侵袭5例,高分化黏膜内癌其肿瘤〉3 cm且有溃疡6例,低分化黏膜内癌期肿瘤〉2 cm 4例,肿瘤侵犯黏膜下层(SM1)且病灶〉3 cm 10例,肿瘤侵犯黏膜下层(SM2) 9例],63例行单纯胃切除手术者(单纯胃切除组),比较两组患者术中、术后及预后情况。结果两组患者基线资料的比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P 〉 0.05)。经过评估,ESD追加胃切除组绝对治疗适应证和相对治疗适应证分别有19例(43.2%)和25例(56.8%),单纯胃切除组则分别有28例(44.4%)和35例(55.6%),差异无统计学意义(P= 0.897)。两组手术方式(P= 0.164)、淋巴结清扫方式(P= 0.330)、淋巴结清扫数目(P= 0.467)、淋巴结转移率(P= 0.690)、手术时间(P= 0.932)、术后发热或感染的发生率(P= 0.923)以及术后住院时间(P= 0.687)的差异均无统计学意义。ESD追加胃切除组和单纯胃切除组随访时间分别为(35.5±15.0)月和(29.5±18.1)月(P= 0.072);两组复发率分别为4.5% (2/44)和9.5% (6/63)(P= 0.229);3年无瘤生存率分别为95.5%和89.2%,两组差异无统计学意义(P= 0.571)。结论ESD后追加胃切除手术治疗对早期胃癌的预后无负面影响,疗效与单纯行胃切除手术治疗相似。 Objective To investigate the impact of additional gastrectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) on the prognosis of early gastric cancer. Methods Clinical data of 107 early gastric cancer patients undergoing additional gastrectomy after ESD (research group, n = 44) or radical surgery (control group, n = 63) from January 2008 to December 2014 in Zhongshan Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The reasons for additional gastrectomy after ESD included positive resection margin (n = 10), lymphovascular invasion (n = 5), well-differentiated mucosal tumor with a diameter 〉3 cm (n =10), poor-differentiated mucosal tumor with a diameter〉2 cm (n = 4), submucosal tumor(sml ) with a diameter 〉3 cm(n =10), and submucosal tumor(sm2) (n =9). Operation time, length of stay, lymph node metastasis, tumor recurrence and disease-free survival rate were compared between two groups. Results Baseline data of two groups were not significantly different (all P 〉 0.05). After evaluation, absolute and relative indications were identified in 19 cases (43.2%) and 25 cases (56.8%) of research group, and in 28 cases (44.4%) and 35 cases (55.6%) of control group without significant difference (P= 0.897). Lymph node metastasis occurred in 6 patients (4.5%) after surgery in research group and 6.3% in control group (P=0.690). Operation time was (218.5 ± 74.3) minutes in research group and (219.8 ± 81.8) minutes in control group (P=0.932). Length of stay was (10.0 ± 12.3) days in research group and (10.8 ± 9.9) days in control group (P= 0.687). Follow-up time was (35.5± 15.0) months in research group and (29.5 ± 18.1) months in control group (P = 0.072). Tumor recurrence rate was 4.5% in research group and 9.5% in control group (χ^2 = 0.928, P = 0.229). Mortality was 4.5% in research group and 7.9% in control group (χ^2= 0.487, P= 0.485). Besides, no significant differences of operation mode(P= 0.16
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第8期912-916,共5页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金(81470811) 上海市科委重点医学项目(13411950801)
关键词 胃肿瘤 早期 内镜黏膜下剥离术 胃切除术 对比研究 Stomach neoplasms, early Endoscopic submucosal dissection Gastrectomy Comparative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer[J]. Gut, 2001,48 (2) :225-229. DOI: 10.1136/gut.48.2.225. 被引量:1
  • 2Hirasawa T, Gotoda T, Miyata S, et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis and the feasibility of endoscopic resection for undifferentiated-type early gastric cancer [J]. Gastric Cancer, 2009,12(3) : 148-152. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-009-0515-x. 被引量:1
  • 3Tanaka M, Ono H, Hasuike N, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer[J]. Digestion, 2008,77 Suppl 1 : 23-28. DOI : 10.1159/000111484. 被引量:1
  • 4Jiang X, Hiki N, Yoshiba H, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy in patients with previous endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer [J]. Br J Surg, 2011,98 (3) : 385 -390. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7358. 被引量:1
  • 5Tsujimoto H, Yaguchi Y, Kumano I, et al. Laparoscopic gastrectomy after incomplete endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer [J]. Oncol Rep, 2012,28 (6) :2205-2210. DOI:10.3892/or.2012.2046. 被引量:1
  • 6吴孟超,吴在德.黄家驷外科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:1832-1835. 被引量:140
  • 7Turnbull RB, Kyle K, Watson FR, et al. Cancer of the colon: the influence of the no-touch isolation technic on survival rates [J]. Ann Surg, 1967,166(3) :420-427. DOI: 10.1097/00000658- 196709000-00010. 被引量:1
  • 8Ono H, Yao K, Fujishiro M, et al. Guidelines for endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer[J]. Dig Endose, 2016,28(1):3-15. DOI: 10.1111/den.12518. 被引量:1
  • 9Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (vet.3)[J]. Gastric Cancer, 2011,14: 113-11. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-009-0536-5. 被引量:1
  • 10周平红,姚礼庆.内镜黏膜切除及黏膜下剥离术操作方法和技巧[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2008,25(11):564-567. 被引量:76

二级参考文献7

  • 1任旭,孙晓梅,郝金玉,唐秀芬.内镜治疗消化道粘膜下肿瘤[J].医学研究通讯,2004,33(6):54-56. 被引量:15
  • 2周平红,徐美东,陈巍峰,钟芸诗,张轶群,王萍,王红美,姚礼庆,秦新裕.内镜黏膜下剥离术治疗直肠病变[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2007,24(1):4-7. 被引量:102
  • 3Gotoda T, Kondo H, Ono H, et al. A new endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) procedure using a insulation-tipped diathermic (IT) knife for rectal flat lesions: report of two cases. Gastrointest Endosc, 1999,50 : 560 - 563. 被引量:1
  • 4Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, et al. Management of bleeding concerning endoscopic submucosal dissection with the flex knife for stomach neoplasm. Dig Endosc ,2006,18 ( Suppl 1 ) : S119 - S122. 被引量:1
  • 5Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, et al. Successful nonsurgical management of perforation complicating endoscopic suhmucosal dissection of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasms. Endoscopy, 2006, 38:1001 - 1006. 被引量:1
  • 6Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, ct al. Endoscopic mucosa] resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut,2001,48:225 -229. 被引量:1
  • 7周平红,姚礼庆,秦新裕.经内镜微探头超声检查对结直肠黏膜下肿瘤的诊断价值[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2003,6(1):18-20. 被引量:21

共引文献273

同被引文献214

引证文献29

二级引证文献173

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部