摘要
滥用诉讼是实务上的多发案件,对公正司法荼毒日甚,且囿于实体法律规制阙如,其已成理论与实务两界之难题。滥用诉讼之侵权责任证成难点主系于主观过错洞察与客观损害厘定。主观层面需至恶意之衔,从合法性与合理性两条主线予以结合考察。客观损害主系纯粹经济损失,根据现行《侵权责任法》关于一般侵权责任之规定,通过对"权益保护"进行目的性限缩解释,在相关司法解释的基础上,可以对滥诉行为课以侵权责任。对于有错误裁决之滥诉类型,亦不可违既判力制度之矩矱,应当结合民事诉讼法司法解释之相关规定,通过再审、第三人撤销之诉或执行异议之诉先行撤销错误裁决之前提下,再另行提起侵权之诉。
Action abuse occurs frequently in practice. This causes heavy damage to justice, and has become a serious problem in theory and practice because of lacking substantive law. The main difficulty of tort liability hinges on inspecting the subjective fault and objective damage. Subjective level requires malignity, which is combined with two main lines of legality and rationality. Main objective damages is pure economic loss. By adopting a teleological limited interpretation about the ＂protection of interests and rights＂ in accordance with the existing ＂Tort Liability Act＂ and drawing on relevant judicial interpretations, it is possible to impose the tort on action abuse. In terms of wrongful judgments in action abuse, it is supposed to obey res judicata. A separate appeal for tort action should be lodged with the relevant provisions in Civil Procedure Law Judicial Explanation, on the premise that wrongful judgments are revoked with retrial, third party discharging the judgment or execution disagreement.
出处
《武汉大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第4期97-108,共12页
Wuhan University Journal：Philosophy & Social Science
基金
国家社会科学基金重大招标项目(14ZDC027)
关键词
滥用诉讼
民事诉讼法
侵权责任
恶意诉讼
纯粹经济损失
既判力
action abuse
civil procedural law
tort liability
malign action
pure economic loss
res judicata
