期刊文献+

“新常态”下政府如何提高人们的幸福感——基于民生满意度视角 被引量:6

How the Government Enhance People's Happiness in the New Normal——Based on Livelihood Satisfaction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "新常态"下,如何提高居民的幸福感,摆脱"Easterlin悖论"的发展困境,是政府面临的一大问题。利用中国社会综合调查(CGSS)2013年的微观数据,通过构建民生满意度指数,实证分析了民生满意度对居民幸福感的影响以及民生满意度的影响因素。研究发现,提高收入水平并不一定会持续提高居民的幸福感,但提升民生满意度是提升居民幸福感的一个非常稳健的途径,民生满意度指数每提高0.1,幸福感将提升0.0675,大致相当于阶层认同上升一个等级、人均住房面积增加1.6倍;对于收入水平、阶层地位和经济地位较低的群体,民生满意度的幸福效应更大。在影响民生满意度的微观个体因素中:公共服务充足度、均衡度、便利度、普惠度的满意状况对民生满意度均有显著的正向影响,相互之间几乎不存在替代性,充足度的影响最大;收入与民生满意度呈倒U型关系;受教育程度、阶层认同和主观家庭经济地位对民生满意度均有显著的负向影响。 Under the "New normal", it is a major problem facing the government that how to improve residents' happiness and get rid of " Easterlin paradox". Using the data CGSS2010, this paper studied how happiness was affected by livelihood satisfaction and its influencing factors through creating Livelihood Satisfaction Index. Findings are summarized as follows. Improving the level of income will not necessarily continue to improve residents' happiness, but enhancing residents' is a robust way. Averagely speaking, the happiness score can increase 0. 0675 through reducing LSI by O. 1 is equivalent to the effects of raising class identification one level and the housing area per capita increased 1.6 times. For lower level of income, class and economic status groups, the happiness effect of livelihood Satisfaction is bigger. The satisfactory degree of adequacy, equality, convenience and affordable of public service have positive effect on LSI independently. The relation between income and LSI is inverse U shape. Education, class identification and economic status have negative on LSI.
作者 孙计领
出处 《贵州财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期1-10,共10页 Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金"面向经济复杂性的行为建模与计算实验及应用研究"(71471177) 国家社科基金"我国居民生活质量测定的统计研究"(07BTJ011)
关键词 民生满意度 幸福感 公共服务 livelihood satisfaction happiness public service
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

二级参考文献386

共引文献1351

同被引文献105

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部