摘要
经过多年法治思维的熏陶,我国刑事审判中的形式主义方法论已经占据主导地位。但是,一些热点案件也暴露出忽视实质主义的倾向。刑事审判应以形式主义方法论为基础,以实质主义方法论为检验或补充。实质主义论证主要解决结论的合理性问题;形式主义论证主要解决结论的合法性问题。只注重形式推理,不承认实质推理,有可能出现合法不合理的结论;过于注重实质推理,有可能偏离法治。刑事审判应是形式主义与实质主义的双重演绎。
After many years of the influence of thinking in rule of law, the formalism methodology in criminal justice has already occupied the leading position. However, the tendency of ignoring the substance doctrine has been exposed in some complicated cases. The criminal justice should be based on the formalism methodology, and substantial methodology for inspection or supplement. The pur- pose of substantial methodology is to ensure the rationality of the conclusion, and the formalism methodology legitimacy. Focusing more on the form inference than essence inference, or the opposite, both can cause the inappropriate result. The formalism and substantial methodology should be attached same importance in criminal trial.
出处
《华北水利水电大学学报（社会科学版）》
2016年第3期102-106,共5页
Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社科基金资助项目"刑法适用方法研究"(13FFX005)的阶段性成果
关键词
方法论
形式推理
实质推理
methodology
the form inference
the essence inference
