摘要
党的十八大报告明确要求"增强生态产品生产能力"。生态产品不仅具备维系生态安全和保障生态调节的功能,而且兼具公共品的属性。我国当前的生态产品供给主体主要集中于中央政府、地方政府和少数企业。根据研究发现,三类主体在供给中的博弈将长期存在,只有在政府检查监督的前提下,其他供给主体才具有供给的动力,这显然不是我们期望的最优组合。研究认为打破单中心思路,构建多中心的治理机制,实现供给主体多元化、搭建广泛的筹资渠道、构筑完善的多中心监督体系、加强政府、市场和社会之间配合,才是解决生态产品供给问题的合理选择。
It is mentioned that we should increase our capacity for producing ecological products in the report at 18th Party Congress. Ecological products can not only maintain the ecological security but also are public goods. In China, the suppliers of ecological products are government and enterprises. The games between them can exist for a long time. The main impulse for the suppliers comes from the supervision of government. Only if we transform from pattern of single- center government to polycentric government, we will solve this problem. This pattern involves diverse suppliers, new sources of financing channels and polycentric supervision system.
出处
《生态经济》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第7期96-99,共4页
Ecological Economy
基金
2014年重庆市社会科学规划培养项目"多中心治理视角下的我国生态环境保护管理体制研究"(2014PY06)
2013年重庆工商大学科研启动经费项目"基于强制性介入模式的中国生态补偿政策研究"
关键词
生态产品
博弈
多中心治理
ecological products
game theory
polycentric governance
