摘要
目的比较在常规采血、按摩后采血、温浴后采血、甩手后采血几种不同情况下微血管全血糖第一、第二滴血检测值的差异。方法选取18岁以上的糖尿病门诊及住院患者,分为4组,分别为常规采血组、温浴后采血组、按摩后采血组、甩手后采血组,每组50例,比较不同情况下采集微血管全血糖第一及第二滴血检测值的差别,并同时采集静脉血进行比较。结果使用快速血糖检测仪规范测量血糖时,常规采血组、温浴后采血组、按摩后采血组第一滴血与第二滴血的快速血糖值均差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);甩手后采血组第一滴血高于第二滴血血糖值(P<0.05)。结论清洁洗手后,常规采血下快速血糖仪检测第一滴和第二滴血血糖检测值无明显差别,可取第一滴血作为检测样本。
Objective To investigate the differences between the first and second drop in capillaries glucose concentration under several blood collection circumstances. Methods Patients who are over eighteen years old with diabetes were divided into four groups, such as natural outflowing group（n=50）,warm bathing group（n=50）,regular massaging group（n=50） and wrist swinging group（n=50）.Blood glucose were measured at different circumstances and compared with the value of venous blood results. Results There were no significant differences between the first and second drop in capillaries glucose concentration among natural outflowing, warm bathing and regular massaging group（P〉0.05）,however,first drop blood glucose is remarkably higher than the second drop blood glucose in wrist swinging group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion We recommend adopting natural outflowing method and using the first drop of blood for self-monitoring of blood glucose after washing hands with soap and water.
出处
《糖尿病新世界》
2016年第8期60-63,共4页
Diabetes New World Magazine
基金
温州市科技局项目资助(Y20120119
Y20140513)
温州医科大学附属第二医院院内科研项目
关键词
第一滴血
第二滴血
采血方式
血糖监测
The first drop of blood
The second drop of blood
Blood sampling method
Glucose monitoring
