摘要
我国大学与国家间关系缺乏立法与理论上的清晰界定,导致法院面对大学与其师生等相关人的纠纷时,存在消极不审或盲目救济权利的矛盾局面。从大学发展历史来看,大学因承担"传播知识与科学研究"的职能而享有排除外部势力干预的自治地位。因而,法院对大学决策秉持"学术遵从"的传统立场。在现代法治的背景下,尤其随着人们以权利来思考其期待的取向不断加深,法院审查大学纠纷时,既应尊重大学决策的自主性,又应保障师生等相关人的权利,将对学术客观规律的尊重与权利保障等法治价值的推广相融合,从而确立"有限学术遵从"的新立场。这一立场的确立可从我国《宪法》第47条以及近年来有关大学诉讼的司法实践中找到规范与事实基础。
Lack of the legislative and theoretical definition of relationship between the university and the government in China,resulted in the paradox that the courts neglected the judicial review or relieved rights blindly when facing university disputes.Backing to the university history,the universities enjoyed the autonomous status of preventing the outside forces intervention because they burdened the function of＂transmitting knowledge and scientific study＂.And the courts held the traditional position of＂academic defer ence＂to universities＇ decisions.Nowadays,under the background of rule of law,especially with the tendency of people thinking of their expectations with＂rights＂,the courts should respect universities decisions made in accordance with academic rules,as well as protect relevant human rights.Thus,the new judicial position of ＂limited academic defer ence＂should be established.The article 47 of Chinese Constitution and recent judicial practice in China gave the normative and factual basis for establishing the new judicial position.
出处
《高等教育研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期30-35,104,共7页
Journal of Higher Education
关键词
大学自治
大学诉讼
学术遵从
司法审查
university autonomy
university litigation
academic defer ence
judicial review
