期刊文献+

深水关井作业可靠性贝叶斯-GO法分析 被引量:8

Reliability analysis of deep-water shut-in operation using Bayesian-GO approach
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为防止深水井喷失控事故,综合考虑人因和设备风险因素,采用贝叶斯-GO法分析深水关井作业可靠性。根据深水关井作业可靠性操作路径建立GO图;按照映射规则,将GO图转换成对应的贝叶斯网络;根据贝叶斯法的前向和后向推理计算规则,得出深水关井作业在不同工况下的成功概率及薄弱风险点。结果表明,多因素影响下的深水关井作业成功概率有所降低,溢流险情的发现时间及防喷器(BOP)控制系统的可靠性对关井作业影响较大。 In order to prevent deep-water blowout accidents, considering human errors and equipment failures, reliability analysis of deep-water shut-in operation was analyzed based on Bayesian-GO approach. According to reliability block diagram of deepwater shut-in operation, GO chart of deep-water shut-in operation was built. According to the mapping rules, GO chart was converted into Bayesian network. Successful probability of deep-water shut-in operation under different conditions and weak risk points were got separately using forward inference and backward inference of Bayesian. The result demonstrates that successful probability of deep-water shut-in operation considering multiple factors will be reduced appropriately, and that early detection of overflow and reliability of blowout preventer(BOP) control systems are crucial for successful deep-water shut-in operation.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期144-149,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
关键词 深水关井作业 应急封井 GO图 贝叶斯网络 后验推理 可靠性分析 deep-water shut-in operation emergency shut-off GO chart Bayesian network posterior reasoning reliability analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献48

  • 1王遥,沈祖培.CREAM——第二代人因可靠性分析方法[J].工业工程与管理,2005,10(3):17-21. 被引量:43
  • 2邓歆,孟洛明.基于贝叶斯网络的通信网告警相关性和故障诊断模型[J].电子与信息学报,2007,29(5):1182-1186. 被引量:24
  • 3中国民航总局航空安全办公室.中国民航航空安全报告(2009年)[R].2010. 被引量:1
  • 4中国民航局航空安全办公室,中国民航大学民航安全科学研究所.航空安全中人的因素[M].2001. 被引量:1
  • 5HOLLNAGELE.Cognitive reliability and error analysis method[M].Oxford(UK):Elsevier Science Ltd.1998. 被引量:1
  • 6BP. Deepwater Horizon Accident Investigation Report. 2010. 被引量:1
  • 7Marc Quiliei,Thomas Roche. Risk Assessment of a BOP and Control System for 10,000"Water Depths. SPE 8791, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 8J.H. Fowler, J. R. Roche. System Safety Analysis of Well Control Equipment. SPE 7249,1993. 被引量:1
  • 9Mary Ann Lundteigen, Marvin Rausand. Reliability as- sessment of safety instrumented systems in the oil and gas industry: A practical approach and a case study [ J]. In- ternational Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety En- gineering,2009,16 (2) :187-212. 被引量:1
  • 10Per Holand. Offshore blowout: causes and control. Hous- ton,Texas: Gulf Publishing Company, 1997. 58-100. 被引量:1

共引文献51

同被引文献78

  • 1蔡鉴明,曾峰.基于GO法的供应链可靠性分析[J].公路交通科技,2007,24(3):141-144. 被引量:20
  • 2《海洋钻井手册》编委会.海洋钻井手册[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2009:588. 被引量:5
  • 3Skogdalen J E, Vinnem J E. Quantitative risk analysis of oil and gas drilling, using Deepwater Horizon as case study[ J]. Reliability En- gineering & System Safety, 2012, 100:58 -66. 被引量:1
  • 4Li X, Chen G, Zhu I-I. Quantitative risk analysis on leakage failure of submarine oil and gas pipelines using Bayesian network [ J ]. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2016 ( 103 ) : 163 - 173. 被引量:1
  • 5Skalle P, Podio A L. Trends extracted from 800 Gulf Coast blow- outs during 1960 - 1996[ C]. IADC/SPE drilling conference, Soci- ety of Petroleum Engineers, 1998. 被引量:1
  • 6Abimbola M, Khan F, Khakzad 51. Dynamic safety risk analysis of offshore drilling[ J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process In- dustries, 2014(30): 74-85. 被引量:1
  • 7RAUSANDM(Norway).风险评估理论、方法与应用[M].刘一骝,译.北京:清华大学出版社,2013:76-80. 被引量:1
  • 8OREDA. Offshore reliability data handbook (4th Edition) [ EB/ OL]. SINTEF Industrial Management,Det Norske Veritas, 2002. 被引量:1
  • 9高永海,孙宝江,曹式敬,宋林松,史作法.应用事故树法对深水井控进行风险评估[J].石油钻采工艺,2008,30(2):23-27. 被引量:35
  • 10朱渊,陈国明.海洋平台密集作业空间内H_2S扩散分析[J].安全与环境学报,2009,9(6):140-143. 被引量:6

引证文献8

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部