摘要
"刑事附带民事责任"一词开始出现于学者论著和司法解释中,但其却有矮化民事责任法律地位、错判民事责任实践地位、助长刑事本位主义等重大弊端,是对法律渊源和责任来源的误读,不具有作为法律术语的科学性,是刑法迷信以及相关用语混乱的产物。"刑事损害赔偿责任"可避免上述弊端,是该词的良好替代;"附带民事判决"则可以用作其他具体场合的替代。
The term ' civil liability collateral to criminal responsibility' has already been used in some legal academic works and judicial interpretations. However,such a term is defective in weakening the legal role of civil liability,misjudging the judicial practical role of civil liability, and exacerbating the criminal departmentalism. It is a production of criminal superstition and terminology disorder. To avoid the mentioned disadvantages,the term shall be reasonably substituted by ' compensation liability for criminal damage'. The term ' collateral civil judgment' may be used as an alternative in other concrete occasions.
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第3期137-144,176,共8页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
基金
福建省社科规划青年项目"海峡两岸罪赃移交互助研究"(2014C137)
福建省教育厅教育科研A类项目"刑事和解的责任互动机制研究"(JAS14069)阶段性成果
