期刊文献+

基于主体功能区的辽宁省绩效考核研究 被引量:6

Research on Performance Appraisal of Liaoning Province Based on Major Function Oriented Zoning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 主体功能区规划的制定和实施可为政府差异化的绩效考核提供依据。构建差异化绩效考核评价指标体系,有利于引导形成有序的国土空间开发结构,提高空间利用效率。充分考虑主体功能区对绩效考核的内在要求,构建一套新的绩效考核方法,将考核指标分为主体考核指标和辅助考核指标两组,主体功能指标分值映射到50—100区间,计算方法采用加权聚合法;辅助功能指标分值映射到0.9—1.1,采用求积计算法,两组指标得分相乘得到绩效考核得分。针对辽宁省主体功能区划分,构建优化开发区、重点开发区、农产品主产区和重点生态功能区四类绩效考核指标。 Formulation and implementation of major function oriented zoning planning was provided the basis for the governmental differentiated performance appraisal. Building differentiated performance appraisal was conducive to effectively guide to forming orderly land development structure and improved space utilization efficiency. Taking full account of the inherent requirements from major function oriented zoning to performance appraisal,and to build a new performance appraisal method,the evaluation index was divided into two groups,the main assessment index and the secondary assessment index. The main assessment index value was mapped to 50- 100,and used the weighted aggregation method,the secondary assessment index score was mapped to 0. 9- 1. 1,used quadrature method,and then multiplied the two groups to get the final score. Finally based on major function oriented zoning planning of Liaoning Province,built the performance appraisal for optimization development regions,prioritized development regions,main agricultural production regions and key ecological function regions.
作者 任启龙 王利
出处 《资源开发与市场》 CAS CSSCI 2016年第6期664-668,共5页 Resource Development & Market
基金 国家科技支撑计划项目(编号:2008BAH31B06)
关键词 主体功能区 绩效考核 考核指标 考核方法 major function oriented zoning performance appraisal assessment indicator assessment method
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1蔡立辉.西方国家政府绩效评估的理念及其启示[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,18(1):76-84. 被引量:264
  • 2Frederickson H G. Classics of Public Administration [ M ]. Hartcourt Brace College Publishers : Fort Worth, Texas, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 3Guy Peters B, Donald Savoie. Governance in a Changing Environment [ M ]. Ottawa: Queens University Press, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 4Harry P Hatry. Tracking the Quality of Services[ A]. Handbook of Public Ad- ministration ( Second Edition) [ C ]. Jossey - Bass Inc Publishers, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 5Donald F Kettl. Putting Performance Measurement to Work in the Federal Government[ C]. Paper of the Annual Meeting of the American Political Sci- ence, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 6Hood Christopher. A Public Management for all Seasons? [J] .Public Admin- istration, 1991, ( 1 ) : 92 - 101. 被引量:1
  • 7Ashley L Grosso, Gregg G, Van Ryzin. How Citizens View Government Perfor- mance Reporting [ J]. Public Performance & Management Review, 2011, 35(2) :235 - 250. 被引量:1
  • 8Aki J"aaskel/iinen, Antti Ltinnqvist. Public Service Productivity : How to Cap- ture Outputs? [ J]. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 2011, 2(4) :289 - 302. 被引量:1
  • 9樊杰.我国主体功能区划的科学基础[J].地理学报,2007,62(4):339-350. 被引量:650
  • 10杨伟民.推进形成主体功能区 优化国土开发格局[J].经济纵横,2008(5):17-21. 被引量:36

二级参考文献75

共引文献1028

同被引文献82

引证文献6

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部