期刊文献+

惩罚性赔偿机制在保险人恶意理赔情形下的嵌入研究 被引量:3

On The Embedding Mechanism of Punitive Compensation in The Situation of The Insurer's Bad Faith in Settling Insurance Claims
原文传递
导出
摘要 保险人的恶意理赔是当下"理赔难"这一行业顽疾的一个重要症结。保险合同的关系型特质使保险人在理赔过程中极有可能出现机会主义倾向,采取违背善意且公平交易义务的严重恶意理赔行为。由于价值中立的立场以及受限于承诺履行利益的补偿范围,既有合同法之下的违约责任对此出现了规制乏力。为此,有必要超越既有的合同规范,采取从一般违约跨越到恶意侵权并上升到严重恶意侵权的逐层递进策略,借助侵权责任法之下的惩罚性赔偿机制来矫正这一失范局面。在抽取出严重恶意理赔行为作为嵌入起点的基础上发挥惩罚性赔偿机制的惩罚效应,通过彰显严重恶意理赔的应受责难性来填补违约责任在价值评判方面的功能缺失;同时,借助惩罚性赔偿机制的威慑作用来达到对保险人严重恶意理赔的遏制效应,确保保险消费者获得经济保障以及内心安宁这一固有权益的实现。 The insurer' s bad faith is one of the main factors which have caused the difficulty in settling insurance claims. Due to the relational characteristic of the insurance contract, it is very likely for the insurer to act opportunistically which is a breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. Since the liability system of breach of contract is limited by the value neutrality and the compensation doctrine of foreseeability of damages it cannot effectively deter the insurer' s bad faith behavior during the process of settling insurance claims. Therefore, it is necessary to surpass the present regulation of contract law and move into the liability system of bad faith tort and finally ascend to that of the serious bad faith tort. On this basis, the punitive compensation system can solve the problem of regulation failure. Punitive compensation should be applied to the serious bad faith tort in settling insurance claims. In this way, the punishment function will fill the blank of value judgments and the deterrence function can curb the serious bad faith in settling insurance claims. These measures can help the insurance consumers realize their inherent rights of obtaining financial security and peace of mind.
出处 《保险研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第4期88-98,共11页 Insurance Studies
基金 作者主持的2015年国家社科基金一般项目"恶意理赔的侵权救济研究"(15BFX177) 四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地中国金融法研究中心资助的阶段性研究成果
关键词 惩罚性赔偿 关系型合同 机会主义行为 严重恶意理赔行为 punitive compensation relational contract surance claims opportunistic behavior the serious bad faith in settling insurance claims
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1[美]安东尼·J.赛博克.美国的惩罚性赔偿金[J].惩罚性赔偿金:普通法与大陆法的视角,中国法制出版社.2012:191-247. 被引量:1
  • 2金福海..惩罚性赔偿制度研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2008:260.
  • 3[美]路易斯·菲斯海尔.对惩罚性赔偿金的经济分析[J].惩罚性赔偿金:普通法与大陆法的视角,中国法制出版社,2012:273-297. 被引量:1
  • 4杨立新著..侵权责任法[M].北京:法律出版社,2012:591.
  • 5张新宝,李倩.惩罚性赔偿的立法选择[J].清华法学,2009,3(4):5-20. 被引量:236
  • 6Charles M. Louderback&Thomas W. Jurika. Standards for Limiting the Tort of Bad FaithBreach of Contract [J]. University of San Francisco Law Review,1982,16 (2) :187 -228. 被引量:1
  • 7Douglas R. Richmond. Defining and Confining Institutional Bad Faith in Insurance [ J ]. Tort Trial & Insur- ance Practice Law Journal ,2010,46 ( 1 ) : 1 - 32. 被引量:1
  • 8David F. Partlett. Punitive Damages:Legal Hot Zones [ J ]. Louisiana Law Review, 1996,56 (4) :781 - 824. 被引量:1
  • 9Frank J. Cavico, Jr. Punitive Damages for Breach of Contract - - A Principled Approach [ J ]. Saint Mary's Law Journal, 1990,22 (2) :357 -454. 被引量:1
  • 10Jay. Feinman. The Insurance Relationship as Relational Contract and the "Fairly Debatable" Rule for First - Party Bad Faith [J]. San Diego Law Review,2009,46 (3):553 -572. 被引量:1

二级参考文献6

同被引文献50

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部