摘要
目的本文对脑动脉瘤患者应用开颅夹闭与血管栓塞治疗的安全性进行对比和探究。方法选择收治的脑动脉瘤患者50例,按照入院先后顺序平均分组,各25例。接受开颅夹闭治疗的患者设为对照组,接受血管栓塞治疗的患者为研究组,对比两组脑动脉瘤患者的临床疗效。结果经不同方法治疗后,研究组患者的临床治疗总有效率高于对照组,住院时间短于对照组,并发症发生率同对照组进行对比,研究组较低。结论脑动脉瘤患者应用血管栓塞治疗的临床疗效优于开颅夹闭。
Objective To compare and explore the security of craniotomy clipping and vascular embolization applied to the treatment of patients with cerebral aneurysm. Methods 50 patients with cerebral aneurysm were divided into two groups with 25 cases in each group,according to the order of hospitalization. Specifically,the patients treated by craniotomy clipping in the control group and the patients treated by intravascular embolization in the research group. Then compared the clinical effect of these two therapies. Results After treatment by different methods,the total clinical effective rate in the research group was higher than that the control group,the length of stay in the research group was shorter than that in the control group,and the incidence of complications in the research group was lower than that in the control group. Conclusion The treatment of patients with cerebral aneurysm by vascular embolization is better than by craniotomy clipping clinically.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2016年第6期59-60,共2页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
脑动脉瘤
开颅夹闭
血管栓塞
Cerebral aneurysm
Craniotomy clipping
Vascular embolization
