摘要
国际海底区域活动的开展要求国际海底管理局制定相应的规则、规章。对管理局以往规章制定过程的实证研究表明,管理局造法权力的行使呈现出与法律文本要求不同的面相。法律和技术委员会成为了名义上的规章拟订者,大会的权力虚置,理事会决定了造法的进程和关键内容,秘书处为顺利造法发挥了基础性的作用,专家则提供了充分的辅助。法律机制设置、机构的不同特性和国际海底区域事务的专业化是造成这种权力格局的原因。对我国而言,应利用现有基础,深度参与造法;补"短板",全面参与造法;同时在国际法治与国内法治双向互动之下,加强对中国国际海底区域活动者的保护。
The conduct of activities in the international seabed area demands that International Seabed Authority makes corresponding rules and regulations. Study on the institutional framework shows that they presented a different power pattern from that required by United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and Agreement Related to the Implement of Part XI of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The legal and technical commission nominally drafted the regulations,the assembly did not perform its power fully,the council controlled the process of law-making and decided the critical contents,the secretariat paved the basis to law-making and the experts offered adequate assistance. The reasons for such situation are that the setup of legal regime,different characteristics of organizations and specialization of the international seabed area issues. The thesis also puts forward the enlightenment to our country.
出处
《太平洋学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期14-23,共10页
Pacific Journal
基金
国家社科基金重点项目"国际法上的历史性权利及对南海问题的法律意涵"(14A2D126)的阶段性成果
关键词
造法
国际海底管理局
联合国海洋法公约
组织机构
law-making
International Seabed Authority
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
institutional framework
