摘要
目的:探索不同针刺方法对慢性腰肌劳损患者生活质量的影响及腰部力量的改善情况。方法:选取符合诊断标准的慢性腰肌劳损的患者90例,随机分成毫针组、电针组、温针组三组,每组各30人,分别采用毫针、电针、温针的不同方法治疗。观察三组患者生活质量及腰部力量的改善情况。结果:温针在患者生活质量的改善方面优于毫针和电针(P<0.05);温针和电针在腰部力量的改善上优于毫针(P<0.05),而温针和电针之间差异不明显(P>0.05)。结论:三种针灸方法均能在一定程度上改善患者生活质量和腰部力量,但综合来看,温针更优于毫针和电针,说明温针在慢性腰肌劳损的治疗中具有一定的优势,可在临床上推广应用。
Objective： To explore different methods of acupuncture dependent life quality of chronic lumbar mus-cle strain patients and the improvement of the waist forces. Methods： Chronic lumbar muscle strain of 90 patientswere selected by the diagonist criteria and randomly divided into Filiform needle group, electric acupuncturegroup, Warm acupuncture groups, each group of 30 people, were treatrd by different methods of acupuncturetreatment. Observation of the three groups to improve patient quality of life and the power of the waist. Result： TheWarm acupuncture groups is better than Filiform needle group and EA group （ P 〈 0. 05） in improving the qualityof life of patients; and warm needle acupunctmle is superior in improving the0. 05）, while there is no significant difference （P 〉 0.05 ） betweenacupuncture. Conclusion： The three acupuncture methods can improve patientsstrengthof the waist needle （ P 〈the warm needle and electricituality of life and the power of thewaist to some extent, but on the whole, the warm needle is better than Filiform needle and acupuncture needle,indicating that warm needle has certain advantages in the treatment of chronic lumbar muscle strain, and it couldbe applied in clinical practice.
出处
《宜春学院学报》
2016年第3期60-61,共2页
Journal of Yichun University
基金
江西省科技厅社会发展类科技项目资助(项目编号:20142BBG70036)
关键词
毫针
电针
温针
腰肌劳损
生活质量
Filiform needle
electric acupuncture
warm needle
strain of lumbar muscles
quality of life
