摘要
目的了解全科医学骨干师资的培训需求，为有效开展全科师资培训提供参考。方法2014年3月采用横断面调查的方法，以自行设计的全科医学骨干师资培训需求调查问卷，对参加上海全国全科医学骨干师资培训班的学员进行调查。内容包括全科骨干师资在全科知识、教学及考核方式、培训方式和培训形式等方面的需求，同时比较社区教学基地师资和临床教学基地师资在上述培训需求的差异。结果共有151名全科骨干师资完成了问卷调查，平均年龄（38±6）岁，其中社区教学基地师资占67.5%（102/151），临床教学基地师资占29.8%（45/151），参加过全科规范化培训工作的学员占60.9%（92/151）。学员对全科相关知识中＂全科医疗常见技能＂（72.2%，109/151）和＂全科医学临床思维＂（70.2%，106/151）的培训需求高，而对＂全科医学基本概念＂的培训需求仅占25.8%（39/151）。临床教学基地师资对＂全科医师培养相关政策制度＂的培训需求比例高于社区教学基地师资（66.7%比44.1%，χ^2＝6.353，P〈0.05）。在教学能力培训需求中，学员希望在教学方法（85.4%，129/151）、教学考核和评估方法（75.5%，114/151）上有所提高。骨干师资对新型的教学和考核方式[如以问题为导向的学习（PBL）、客观结构化临床考核（OSCE）、小型临床演练评量（mini－CEX）、临床操作技能评估（DOPS）]兴趣较大，并会应用于以后的教学中（均P〈0.01）。学员感兴趣的培训方式依次为工作坊（58.3%，88/151）、教学示范（57.0%、86/151）、教学经验交流（50.3%，76/151），理论授课仅占38.4%（58/151）。对于今后骨干师资培训形式感兴趣的依次为参观学习访问（71.5%，108/151）、短期学习班（49.0%，74/151）、境外进修访问（39.1%，59/151）和远程网络学习（27.8%，42/151）。结论全科骨干师资培训学员以社区�
Objective To survey the training needs for key general practice （GP） trainers. Methods The survey was conducted among participants of the first training course for national key GP trainers hold on March 2014 in Shanghai. The contents of questionnaire used for the survey included training needs of GP relevant knowledge, teaching ability and modes of assessment. The differences in training needs between GP trainers from community teaching bases and hospital teaching bases were analyzed. Results Total 151 key trainers completed the questionnaire （male/female： 48/103 ） with average age of （38 ± 6） years. Among them 67.5% （ 102/151 ） were from community teaching bases and 29.8% （45/151） from hospital teaching bases; 60.9% （92/151） participated in the General Practitioner Structured Vocational Training Program （GPSVTP）. According to the survey, ＂general practice clinical kills＂ （72. 2%, 106/ 151 ） and ＂general practice clinical thinking＂ （70. 2% , 106/151 ） were most required relevant knowledge; while ＂general practice basic concept＂ was least required （25.8%, 39/151 ）. The rate with need of ＂policy system related GP training＂ in hospital trainers was higher than that in community teaching base trainers （66. 7% vs. 44. 1%, P 〈 0.05）. For teaching ability needs, 85.4% （129/151） selected teaching methods, 75.5% （114/151） chose teaching assessment and evaluation methods. The participants showed more interesting in new-type teaching and evaluation methods, such as PBL, OSCE, mini-CEX and DOPS, and would use them in future teaching work （ P 〈0.01 ）. Workshop （58.3%, 88/151 ）, demonstration （57.0%, 86/151 ） and experience exchange （50. 3%, 76/151 ） were three most interested modes in current training; meanwhile theoretic teaching was lease interested （38.4%, 58/151 ）. Study tour was most interested training models for the future （71.5% , 108/151 ）, followed by short-term courses （49. 0%, 74/ 151 ）, overseas study （39. 1%,
出处
《中华全科医师杂志》
2016年第4期258-263,共6页
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
基金
上海市卫生和计划生育委员会科研项目（201540109）
上海市公共卫生人才培养计划（全科医学）（GWDTR201210）
关键词
师资培训
问卷调查
全科医学
Teacher training
Questionnaire
General Practice
