摘要
尽管合同解除有溯及力依然占据学界主导地位,但对其批判从未停止。以我国民法为基础,用实证分析方法从导致逻辑矛盾、破坏交易安全、不符合经济效益需求、违背平等保护原则四个维度对解除有溯及力展开批判,反向论证解除无溯及力的合理性;并对合同解除后原物返还请求权的实际效果进行反思;提出以解除无溯及力为基础重构我国合同解除效力制度。
Despite the theory that rescission of contracts has the retroactive effect still occupy a dominant position in academics, the criticism towards it has never stopped. Based on the empirical analysis on the Civil Law of China, the thesis criticizes the theory that rescission of contracts has the retroactive effect in four dimensions which cover leading to logical contradiction, destroying the security of transactions, failing of meeting economic needs, and violating the principle of equal protection; it also demonstrates the justifiability that the retroactive effect shall not exist when a contract rescinds from the reverse side. Then, the thesis reflects on the practical effect of the right of claim for return of property after rescission, of contracts, further proposes a theory to i＇econstruct the system of the effect on contractual rescission in China based on the idea that retroactive effect shall not exist when rescission of contract occurs.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第5期22-32,共11页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
溯及力
逻辑矛盾
交易安全
经济效益
平等保护
retroactive effect
logical contradiction
transaction security
economic effect
equalprotection
