期刊文献+

维生素类药物预防化疗致周围神经毒性的疗效及安全性的Meta分析 被引量:9

Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Vitamins in Preventing Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Cancer Patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的系统评价维生素类药物预防化疗致周围神经毒性(peripheral neuropathy,PNP)的疗效及安全性。方法全面检索Pub Med、EMbase、Cochrane Libraries、CNKI、万方和维普数据库中收录的维生素类药物预防化疗致PNP的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时限均从建库至2015年8月。在资料提取和质量评价后,采用Rev Man5.3软件进行meta分析。结果共纳入14个RCT,包括889例患者。Meta分析结果显示:1维生素E组与对照组在预防顺铂致PNP总发生率[RR=0.34,95%CI(0.18,0.66),P=0.001]、严重PNP发生率[RR=0.25,95%CI(0.08,0.77),P=0.02]及PNP评分[SMD=?0.79,95%CI(?1.20,?0.37),P=0.000 2]方面均有统计学差异;在预防紫杉醇致PNP总发生率[RR=0.30,95%CI(0.10,0.89),P=0.03]及PNP评分[SMD=?0.95,95%CI(?1.69,?0.21),P=0.01]方面有统计学差异,而在严重PNP发生率方面无统计学差异;在预防奥沙利铂致PNP总发生率及严重PNP发生率方面均无统计学差异;2甲钴胺组与对照组在预防化疗致PNP总发生率[RR=0.44,95%CI(0.36,0.55),P<0.000 01]、严重PNP发生率[RR=0.28,95%CI(0.18,0.43),P<0.000 01]及PNP评分[SMD=?0.64,95%CI(?1.00,?0.27),P=0.000 7]方面均有统计学差异。纳入所有研究均未发现与维生素E或甲钴胺相关的不良反应发生。结论在预防顺铂致PNP时应选维生素E;在预防奥沙利铂或长春新碱致PNP时应选甲钴胺;在预防紫杉醇致PNP时优选甲钴胺,次选维生素E。 OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy and safety of vitamins in preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy(PNP) in cancer patients. METHODS Studies were identified by searching Pub Med, EMbase, Cochrane Libraries, CNKI, Wan Fang and Wei Pu Database from the date of establishment until August 2015. Randomized controlled trials(RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of vitamins in preventing chemotherapy-induced PNP in cancer patients were included. Statistical analysis was performed with Rev Man5.3. RESULTS Fourteen RCTs involving 889 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses were as follows: 1There were statistically significant differences between vitamin E group and control group in all incidence of PNP [RR=0.34, 95%CI(0.18, 0.66), P=0.001], incidence of severe PNP [RR=0.25, 95%CI(0.08, 0.77), P=0.02] and PNP score [SMD=-0.79, 95%CI(-1.20, -0.37), P=0.000 2] by cisplatin; There were statistically significant differences between vitamin E group and control group in all incidence of PNP [RR=0. 30, 95%CI(0.10, 0.89), P=0.03] and PNP score [SMD=-0.95, 95%CI(-1.69, -0.21), P=0.01] by paclitaxel, while no statistically significant differences in incidence of severe PNP; There were no statistically significant differences between vitamin E group and control group in all incidence of PNP and incidence of severe PNP by oxaliplatin. 2There were statistically significant differences between mecobalamine group and control group in all incidence of PNP [RR=0.44, 95%CI(0.36, 0.55), P0.000 01], incidence of severe PNP [RR=0.28, 95%CI(0.18, 0.43), P0.000 01] and PNP score [SMD=-0.64, 95%CI(-1.00, -0.27), P=0.000 7]. All studies included found no adverse reactions induced by vitamin E or mecobalamine. CONCLUSION In order to prevent PNP by cisplatin, vitamin E should be chosen. In order to prevent PNP by oxaliplatin or vincristine, mecobalamine should be chosen. Mecobalamine should be the better choice than vitamin E in preventing PNP by paclitaxel.
出处 《中国现代应用药学》 CAS CSCD 2016年第4期476-484,共9页 Chinese Journal of Modern Applied Pharmacy
基金 天津市卫生局科技基金(2014KY09)
关键词 维生素类药物 化疗 预防 周围神经毒性 META分析 vitamins chemotherapy prevention peripheral neuropathy meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献51

共引文献46

同被引文献103

引证文献9

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部