摘要
2014年,E.Sosa、M.Slote和米建国三人分别代表德性知识论、德性伦理学和中国哲学共同宣称一个德性转向的时代已经来临,整个人文社会科学研究领域都存在"德性转向"。目前,学界存在两种德性知识论:一种是以E.Sosa为代表的"德性可靠论",认为德性知识论要面对知识的确定性问题,面对怀疑论的挑战,它要思考如何通过我们可靠认知机制来获得一种知识上的确定性。这派的影响力更适合当代西方知识论的主流后盖梯尔(Post-Gettier)的传统。另外一派是以L.Zagzebski为代表的德性责任论,是一种以人格特质为基础的德性知识论,以伦理学的架构模型来处理知识论的议题。两者之间的区别在于:Sosa一派是把知识当做行动在研究,即知识作为行动(knowledge as action),而Zagzebski是在谈知识的价值,即在行动中的知识(knowledge in action)。
In 2014,Chienkuo Mi together with Ernest Sosa and Michael Slote who are leading figures in the fields ofChinese philosophy,virtue epistemology and virtue ethics respectively launched an initiative on'virtue turn'.There exist two types of virtue epistemology. One is virtue reliabilism with Sosa as the leading proponent. It be-lieves that virtue epistemology has to solve the problem of certainty of knowledge. To counter the arguments ofphilosophical skepticism,it requires that a belief be the product of some reliable method if it is to be consideredknowledge. The other is virtue responsibism with Zagzebski as its symbol. It is a theory of knowledge based onpersonality traits and ethics. The former conceives knowledge as action while the latter studies epistemic value,i.e.,knowledge in action.
出处
《东南大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第2期21-28,共8页
Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)
