期刊文献+

山羊不稳定骨盆骨折致骶丛神经牵拉损伤模型的建立及神经电生理研究 被引量:1

Establishment and electrophysiological study of unstable pelvic fracture model with sacral plexus stretch injury in goats
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的建立不稳定骨盆骨折致骶丛神经牵拉损伤动物模型,并利用神经电生理技术,判断骶丛神经在骨盆不同移位方向及距离时的损伤程度,探讨移位方向和距离与骶丛神经损伤的关系。方法选择山羊24只,按随机数字表法分为三组:A组(骨盆纵向移位)、B组(骨盆侧方移位)、C组(骨盆背侧移位),每组8只;另正常组为骨盆移位前的所有山羊数。暴露山羊左侧L6、S1神经根及坐骨神经起始段,分别与引导电极和刺激电极连接,以1圈/s(1圈=0.25mm)速度牵拉骨盆,建立不稳定骨盆骨折致骶丛神经牵拉损伤模型。当骨盆移位距离分别为0,0.5,1.0cm时,记录山羊L6、S1神经的阈电位、最大刺激电位、峰峰值和潜伏期。结果随着骨盆牵拉距离的增大,三组神经阈电位、最大刺激电位、潜伏期均呈逐渐增加趋势,而峰峰值均呈逐渐降低趋势。骨盆不同方向移位0.5cm时,A组神经阈电位、潜伏期均明显高于正常组(P〈0.05),峰峰值明显低于正常组(P〈0.05),最大刺激电位较正常组差异无统计学意义;B组除峰峰值明显低于正常组(P〈0.05)外,其余电生理信号均发生改变,但与正常组比较差异无统计学意义;C组所有电生理信号变化均不明显。骨盆不同方向移位1.0cm时,A、B组神经阈电位、最大刺激电位、潜伏期均明显高于正常组(P〈0.05),而峰峰值均明显低于正常组(P〈0.05);C组除潜伏期明显高于正常组(P〈0.05)外,其余电生理信号均不同程度发生改变,但较正常组差异均无统计学意义。三组电生理信号变化幅度比较,A组最明显,B组次之,C组最小。结论山羊不稳定骨盆骨折致骶丛神经牵拉损伤后,骨盆纵向移位时,骶丛神经牵拉损伤程度最严重。 Objective To establish a reliable unstable pelvic fracture model with sacral plexus stretch injury in goats and to detect electrophysiological signals when pelvis is shifted in different orientations and distance. Methods Twenty-four goats were divided into three groups of 8 animals each: pelvic longitudinal displacement was induced in group A, pelvic lateral displacement in group B, and pelvic dorsal displacement in group C. Animal left L6 and S1 nerve root and initial segment of sciatic nerve were exposed to connect stimulating and receiving electrodes respectively. Left pelvis was shifted at the speed of O. 25 mm/s to produce the model of unstable pelvic fracture with sacral plexus stretch injury. Electrophysiological signals of Ls and S1 were recorded when the placement of pelvis was 0, 0.5 and 1.0 cm respectively. Results With pelvic displacement, the threshold potential, maximum stimulus potential and incubation period were gradually increased, but the peak-to-peak value became smallergradually. When the pelvis displaced 0.5 cm at different orientations, group A showed improved threshold potential and incubation period (P 〈0. 05), decreased peak-to-peak value (P 〈0. 05), and no significant change in maximum stimulus potential(P 〉0.05) ; group B only showed lowered peak-to-peak value with no significant variations in other electrophysiological signals ( P 〈 O. 05 ) ; group C had no significant variations in all electrophysiological signals ( P 〉 O. 05). When the pelvis displaced 1.0 cm at different orientations, groups A and B showed improved threshold potential, maximum stimulus potential and incubation period (P 〈 O. 05 ) and lowered peak to peak value ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; group C showed higher incubation period with no significant variations in other electrophysiological signals(P 〈0.05). Between groups, the amplitude of variation in electrophysiological signals was the most in group A and the least in group C. Conclusion After unstable pelvis fracture in goats,
出处 《中华创伤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2016年第4期344-349,共6页 Chinese Journal of Trauma
基金 基金项目:国家自然科学基金(81171708,81401786)
关键词 骨盆 腰骶丛 电生理学 Pelvis Lumbosacral plexus Electrophysiology
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Siegmeth A, Milliner T, Kukla C, et al. Associated injuries in severe pelvic trauma[ J ]. Der Unfallchirurg, 2000, 103 (7) :572- 581. 被引量:1
  • 2Tonetti J, Cazal C, Eid A, et al. Neurological damage in pelvic injuries; a continuous prospective series of 50 pelvic injuries treated with an iliosaeral lag screw[ J]. Retour Au Numro, 2004, 90(2) :122-131. 被引量:1
  • 3Majeed SA. Neurologie deficits in major pelvie injuries [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1992, 282(9) :222-228. 被引量:1
  • 4Reilly MC, Zinar DM, Matta JM. Neurologie injuries in pelvic ring fractures [ J ]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1996, 329 (8) :28-36. 被引量:1
  • 5陈爱民,李永川,赵良瑜,叶添文,郭永飞,鹿楠,朱磊,张志凌,李菁,杨迪,朱清华,欧阳跃平,刘岩,侯春林.骨盆后环不稳定伴骶丛损伤的诊断和治疗[J].中华创伤杂志,2012,28(6):516-519. 被引量:18
  • 6Chiedo A. Neurologic injury associated with pelvic trauma: radiology and electrodiagnosis evaluation and their relationships to pain and gait outcome [ J ]. Arch Phys Med Rehab, 2007, 88 ( 9 ) : 1171-1176. 被引量:1
  • 7Hessmann PD, Rickert M, Hofmann A, et al. Outcome in pelvic ring fractures [ J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2010, 36 (2) : 124-130. 被引量:1
  • 8李亚洲,潘进社,彭阿钦,张奉琪,张敏.骨盆后环骨折神经损伤的临床解剖学研究[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2004,22(2):122-124. 被引量:24
  • 9Inaba K, Sharkey PW, Stephen DJ, et al. The increasing incidence of severe pelvic injury in motor vehicle collisions[J]. Injury, 2004, 35(8) :759-765. 被引量:1
  • 10Takashi S, Masateru S, Kazui S, et al. Long-term functional outcome after unstable pelvic ring fracture[ J]. J Trauma, 2007, 63 (4) :884-888. 被引量:1

二级参考文献53

  • 1刘雷,池雷庭,屠重棋,沈彬,周宗科,裴福兴.Observation and establishment of an animal model of tractive spinal cord injury in rats[J].Chinese Journal of Traumatology,2004,7(6):372-377. 被引量:4
  • 2郑宪友,顾玉东,史其林,李继峰,孙贵新,周琳.大鼠单纯臂丛下干损伤屈指功能重建动物模型的探讨[J].中华显微外科杂志,2005,28(1):52-54. 被引量:1
  • 3崔志明,保国锋,蔡卫华,李卫东,袁锟,徐冠华.腰椎管狭窄症术后下肢残留麻木的发生率及影响因素[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(21):1614-1616. 被引量:9
  • 4Duggal N, Mendiondo I, Pares HR, et al. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of failed back surgery syndrome: an outcome analysis. Neurosurgery 2004;54(3):636-643. 被引量:1
  • 5Haba K, Ikeda M, Soma M, et al. Bilateral decompression of multilevel lumbar spinal stenosis through a unilateral approach. J Clin Neurosci 2005;12(2): 169-171. 被引量:1
  • 6Hazard RG, Failed back surgery syndrome: surgical and nonsurgical approaches. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006;443:228-232. 被引量:1
  • 7Feltes C, Fountas K, Davydov R, et al. Effects of nerve root retraction in lumbar discectomy. Neurosurg Focus 2002; 13(2):E6. 被引量:1
  • 8Peng B, Hao J, Hou S, Wu W, et al. Possible pathogenesis of painful intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 2006;31(5): 560-566. 被引量:1
  • 9The Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China. Guidance suggestion of caring laboratory animals. 2006-09-30. http://www.most.gov.cn/zfwj/zfwj2006/200512/t20051214_54389.htm. 被引量:1
  • 10Katayama Y, Matsuyama Y, Yoshihara H,et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between macro discectomy and micro discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomized study with surgery performed by the same spine surgeon. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19(5):344-347. 被引量:1

共引文献43

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部