摘要
章学诚重视学术源流的疏浚,而不是泛泛的学术考辨。他认为纷繁芜杂的图书差异和门类众多的学术纷争都可以转换为源流之辨,而目录学的旨趣即在于通过疏浚学术源流,引领"流"意义上的现实图书和学术回归"源"意义上的理想状态,从而将图书和学术化约为历时性的时间序列,而不是共时性的空间秩序。源流二分既是他考察图书、学术的根本视野,也是规范目录学理念和方法的基本原则。因此,疏浚学术的"源流",才是章学诚久执不改的目录学信念。
Academic and academic sources are different concepts. Zhang Xuecheng paid attention to dredging academic origin rather than general academic research. He thought that the numerous differences of books and all kinds of academic disputes could be converted to the origin＇s distinguishing and the purport of Bibliography namely is by dredging academic origins to lead the real books and scholarism in sense of ＂fluxion＂ to return to the ideal status in sense of ＂source＂. By doing so, we can look upon books and sehol- arism from diachronic time series rather than the synchronic spatial order. Origin dichotomy is not only his fundamental vision of investigating books and scholarism, but also the basic principles of regulating Bibli- ography idea and method. Therefore, dredging academic ＂origins＂ is the Bibliography faith which is execu- ted for a long time by Zhang Xuecheng.
出处
《大学图书馆学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2016年第2期111-117,共7页
Journal of Academic Libraries
关键词
章学诚
目录学
学术源流
Zhang Xuecheng
Bibliography
Academic Origins
