期刊文献+

专业背景、主观印象及情绪对刑罚决策的影响 被引量:2

The Influence of Professional Background, Subjective Impression and Emotions on Criminal Judgment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了考察司法决策者对案件当事人的主观印象如何影响刑罚决策及情绪在其中的作用,本研究要求法律与非法律专业被试对案情相同但对案件当事人的主观印象不同的刑事案件进行刑罚强度决策,并要求被试对犯罪行为所引发的情绪强度进行评定。研究结果发现,在施害人消极印象比在积极印象条件下,被试产生更强的愤怒和厌恶情绪,更少的同情情绪,同时,给予的刑罚更重;在受害人积极印象比在消极印象条件下,低年级组被试对施害人给予的刑罚更重,但在高年级组被试中不存在显著差异,两组被试在情绪强度上也没有显著差异。法律专业比非法律专业被试对犯罪行为所产生的情绪强度更低。被试的专业背景对量刑决策没有显著影响。中介效应检验发现,在施害人的主观印象对刑罚决策的影响过程中,愤怒和同情情绪表现出部分中介效应,厌恶情绪表现出完全中介效应。 Background: Criminal judgment and decision making have triggered great interests among legal and psychological researchers. It refers to the processes of decision making related to guilt verdict and penalty by juries or judges based on the facts of the crimes according to the provisions of the law. Previous findings demonstrate that extraneous factors, such as irrelevant emotions, and physical features of criminal suspects, could affect criminal judgments. It is possible that juries or judges gain a positive or negative impression of a criminal suspect from knowing the information about his and the victims' personalities, family background, personal experience or occupations, all of which should be considered as extraneous factors and should not be taken into account in the course of criminal judgments. However, it is unknown how these factors affect legal decisions and what mechanisms underlie the process of criminal judgment. Method: In order to investigate how and why the impression of parties to a case (the perpetrators and the victims) has an influence on the penalty judgments. Legal students and non-legal professional students were asked to make penalty judgments on the case, each including the same criminal act but different descriptions of the personal traits of the perpetrators and the victims. After the judgment task, participants were asked to assess the emotional responses triggered by the criminal behaviors. Results: Results showed that when the impression of the perpetrators was negative, participants felt more anger and disgust, less sympathy towards the criminal behavior; in the meantime, they gave higher punishment scores than when the impression of the perpetrators was positive. When the subjective impression of the victims was positive, lower-grade participants gave higher punishment scores. No effect of the impression of victims was found on the punishment scores among higher-grade participants. Neither did we find any differences of the intensity for each of the three emotions b
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2016年第2期441-447,共7页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31440046) 浙江省哲学社会科学基金项目(12JCJY19YB)的资助
关键词 刑罚决策 愤怒 厌恶 同情 criminal judgment, anger, disgust, sympathy
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

二级参考文献57

  • 1汪明亮.论定罪量刑中的法官情感[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2004(6):7-13. 被引量:12
  • 2李安.裁判形成的思维过程[J].法制与社会发展,2007,13(4):11-19. 被引量:13
  • 3汉斯,托奇,周嘉桂.(1986).司法和犯罪心理学.北京:群众出版杜. 被引量:1
  • 4卡多佐,B.N.(1998).司法过程的性质(苏力译).商务印书馆. 被引量:1
  • 5王迎村.(2006).法官个人因素对判案影响之考量.苏州大学硕士学位论文. 被引量:1
  • 6Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 30(5), 961-981. 被引量:1
  • 7Bell, D. E. (1985). Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Operations Research, 33(1), 1-27. 被引量:1
  • 8Blanchard-Fields, F. (2007). Everyday problem solving and emotion an adult developmental perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(1), 26-31. 被引量:1
  • 9Bymes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis.Psyehological Bulletin, 125(3), 367-383. 被引量:1
  • 10Dory, R. L., & Cameron, E. L. (2009). Sex differences and reproductive hormone influences on human odor perception. Physiology and Behavior, 97(2), 213- 228. 被引量:1

共引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部