期刊文献+

前路椎间盘减压融合与前路椎体次全切除减压融合治疗多节段颈椎病的疗效比较 被引量:8

Comparison of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion and Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探索前路椎间盘减压融合与前路椎体次全切除减压治疗多节段颈椎病的疗效,为临床手术方式的选择提供依据。方法:收集我院骨科2008年6月到2014年6月收治的多节段颈椎病患者26例,按照患者手术方式分为研究组(13例)和对照组(13例),研究组给予前路椎间盘减压融合治疗,对照组给予前路椎体次全切除减压治疗,对比两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间,记录并分析两组术前和术后3月、6月、12个月JOA评分、颈椎总活动度、颈椎曲度、颈椎节段高度。结果:研究组手术时间、术中出血量低于对照组(P<0.05);两组JOA评分术前、术后3月、6月、12个月逐渐升高(P<0.05),术后12月组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组颈椎总活动度术前、术后3月、6月、12个月逐渐降低(P<0.05),但是术后同时期组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组颈椎曲度与颈椎节段高度术后3月、6月、12个月差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:前路椎间盘减压融合治疗多节段颈椎病较前路椎体次全切除减压治疗效果好,手术时间短、术中出血量少,并且颈椎曲度和节段高度恢复好。 Objective: To explore the effect of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in the treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy, and to provide the basis for the clinical operation mode. Methods: A total of 26 patients with multilevel cervical myelopathy, who were treated in First Hospital of Fangshan District from June 2008 to June 2014, were selected and divided into study group(n=13) and control group(n=13) according to the operation mode. The study group underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, while the control group underwent anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion. The operation time,intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospitalization time were compared between the two groups; The JOA scores, cervical range of motion, cervical curvature and the height of cervical spine of the two groups were recorded and analyzed before operation and 3 months,6 months, 12 months after operation. Results: The operation time and intraoperative blood loss of the study group were less than those of the control group(P〈0.05). JOA scores of the two groups gradually increased before operation and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after operation(P〈0.05), there were statistically significant differences 12 months after operation between the two groups(P〈0.05). The cervical range of motion of the two groups gradually decreased before operation and 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after operation(P〈0.05)(P〈0.05), without significant differences between the two groups(P〈0.05). There were significantly statistical differences in the cervical curvature and the height of cervical spine 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after operation between the two groups(P〈0.05). Conclusion:Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion has a better effect than anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in the treatment of patients with multilevel cervical myelopathy, with the advantages of shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and better
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2016年第2期313-316,共4页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
关键词 前路椎间盘减压融合 前路椎体次全切减压融合 多节段颈椎病 疗效 Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion Multilevel cervical myelopathy Effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献42

  • 1Kong L D, Meng L C, Wang L F,et al. Evaluation of conservative treatment and timing of surgical intervention for mild forms of cer- vical spondylotic myelopathy [ J ]. Exp Ther Med, 2013,6 ( 3 ) : 852 - 856. 被引量:1
  • 2Traynelis V C, Arnold P M, Fourney D R, et al. Alter,native pro- eedures for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: ar- throplasty, oblique eorpeetomy, skip lamineetomy: evaluation of comparative effectiveness and safety[J]. Spine, 2013,38(22 Sup-pl 1) :S210 -231. 被引量:1
  • 3Liu T,Xu W,Cheng T,et al. Anterior versus posterior surgery for multilevel cervical myelopathy,which one is better? Asystematic review [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2011,20 (2) : 224-235. 被引量:1
  • 4Liu Y,Hou Y,Yang L,et al. Comparison of 3 reconstructive tech- niques in the surgical management of multilevel cervical spondylot- ic myelopathy [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ,2012,37 (23) :E1450- E1458. 被引量:1
  • 5Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Associ- ation Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) : Part 2. Endorsement of the alternative item [J ]. J Orthop Sei, 2007, 12(3) :241-248. 被引量:1
  • 6Cabraja M,Abbushi A, Koeppen D,et al. Comparison between an- terior and posterior decompression with instrumentation for cervical spondylotie myelopathy : sagittal alignment and clinical outcome [J ]. Neurosurg Focus, 2010,28 ( 3 ) : E 15. 被引量:1
  • 7Woods BI, Hohl J, Lee J, et al. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Clin Or- thop Relat Res, 2011,469 (3) : 688-695. 被引量:1
  • 8Lin Q,Zhou X,Wang X,et al. A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and corpectomy in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2012,21 (3) : 474-481. 被引量:1
  • 9Cheng Y, Chen D, Guo Y, et al. Subsidence of titanium mesh cage : a study based on 300 cases[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech,2008,21 (7): 489-492. 被引量:1
  • 10Xia XP, Chen HL, Cheng HB. Prevalence of adjacent segment de- generation after spine surgery:a systematic review and recta-anal- ysis [J ]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 ), 2013,38 (7) : 597-608. 被引量:1

共引文献22

同被引文献75

引证文献8

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部